The moral teachings specifically

And through that they were able to have liberty

Ignoring China

Nobody intended the Bible as a scholarly historical or scientific work

It's a theological work

Yes

By God who used his followers and people to write about him and events concerning him, he made it to explain creation to us and so us in the future would be able to know what has been said and what will happen

>Christian Europeans throughout history have been the only ones capable of developing true civilization
*cries in Chinese, Aztec, Sumerian, Egyptian and thousands of other non-Christian civilizations*

What denom @GHOST

What is "true" civilization?

Not one had liberty

But Europe

Who says?

Liberty is a false god

Says history

What value does Liberty have?

"says history"

@Notso im not a part of any denom

Fuck off, idiot.

„Liberty“ is not the defining characteristic of civilization it is a false ideal

idolized like the golden calf

Liberty comes AFTER order and tradition and virtue

I'm done with this pseud

Ah ok

It's unique

nvm I take that back

An authoritarian society can still be morally right

well, I don't, I just don't mean it towards you

The problem is not with liberty the problem is putting liberty first

^

It can't come first and it's not the most important

You actually said something coherent

Because you can't have it without traditional Christianity

virtue and piety

^

The bible was composed by the church, it isn't the be all end all of anything

We have *2000 years* of teaching on the stuff in it. But without a proper magisterium, it's worthless

Context matters
Always

Comparing Christianity to other religions is just retarded because it's very very unique

Elaborate

Christian societies are nothing like Muslim societies. Christianity alone is God seeking man which is entirely unique to it.