@Otto I think the survival of a society without all members contributing to population growth is a sign of success but ok

which in turn led to better societies

Galatians 4:16

@A Russian Bad Actor eww

@Dronestruck Also, “Wotan” > “Odin.”

In my opinion.

Sounds more imposing.

@Enkrum woden>wotan

wotan be like

In the Anglo-Saxon he would be 'Woden'

But Odin is more recognizable.

I address Odin as Woden in ritual, but in a casual context usually by His more recognizable name.

@Asdrubal this is the part where you tell me to kms

You sure you’re the ideology you state, Drone? You seem very invested in your ancestry.

You’re more or less nationalistic.

I'm invested in my Gods.

"Yeah I see not being able to raise a family and instead dedicating my life to working and almost meaningless relationships as a sign of success."

God

Such a terrible view point

>libertarian

I see the Gods as more powerful than any human nation

>australia

They transcend the nation

John 7:13

No I mean I see a society which survives with people like that as a successful society

>muh religion

Well yes, hence omnipotence.

I don't consider the Gods omnipotent

Neither did the ancients

how can there be more than one God?

@A Russian Bad Actor Let me guess you are a trap or into trap porn

how can there be more than one person, Otto?

bruh

@M240DualWielder probably

How can there be more than one river stone on the river bed?

seems like pagans just worship angels

@M240DualWielder What’s crackin’, mate.

We are a society of consumption, slaves @A Russian Bad Actor

There cannot be more than one Prime Mover