confused

@Dorieus you understand the exercise right? How it pertains to the first hermetic principle, fractals, and synecdoches?

ill work out how to say the right rhoughts on this eventually. yes i understood everything you said im just overwhelmed ig

theres a lot of flaws

So when we're talking the tetragrammaton

YHVH

The four classical elements

yeah

This is a result of tavvas training

Cuz u should be able to break down every single thing in thr world around you using synecdoches into 4 major principles

Big tired. I don’t like standing around

aha

From there u understand how they react with each other

So u see an action

And u know everything it is

what are you trying to deliver

And everything its not

U see its most basic form

And u respond to it

With ur most basic form

That moves it thru the tetragrammaton

@twistmothWelcome to Xyzygy! For rules and information, please check <#618970630296961035>. There are now **847** members on the server.

idk how to respond

because i see flaws

sorry

What flaws

https://youtu.be/8IZPTl48_yQ

ones i feel like ive already pointed out. namely here

where we see the roots of 1 in the complex plane

x(3(1/3))==x(4(1/4))

we only use this model of elements because it ties to GCAT

I didnt say one i said it broken down into 4

1 in itself

breaks down into a scalar stream of 4ths

or 3rds

or anyths

Well metaphysically speaking 3+1=4 pretty important shit

sure theres a lot of important equations. idk what you mean by this one specifically but like. even still

sure

3+1=4

Eggghhh im saying the trinity divided by the monad equalling the tetragrammaton divided by the monad metaphysically makes sense.