Message from @Arcadia_Bay
Discord ID: 647730032290299916
Before
<:julien:630983971252994048>
*Words of wisdom*
A trillion dollars is a trillion dollars fam
Useless statement
Thanks
If you wouldn't let some fags run a train on you to save the western world with your political capital
You're a bad person
This is a fact
can we ban major nigger from existence for not knowing that just because soemthing can be reasoned about doesnt mean it is real
Low-key, gay
or for being illiterate
@Major Slow so you have an honor code that would dictate you must and will still get a train of niggas ran on you after you receive the trillion
High-key, gay for pay.
Made a deal nigga
<:julien:630983971252994048>
nah fuck the west
let the west burn an create a new world
DEAL, OR NO DEAL
Jesus fuck you're struggling to respond to me still? I'm flattered @Epicurus
We got medicine n shiet
@Shane Humans are part of the One regardless of the existence or nonexistence of souls. Rocks are part of the One. So are properties. Concepts. Ideas. What-have-yous. It doesn't mean that everything which is part of the One is physical. The laws of logic are metaphysical objects without a physical correlative, for example. So when I imagine, say, you doing a little dance in my office, it doesn't mean there is a physical you that others can interact with dancing in my office. The *idea* exists and is part of the One, but it doesn't hold the property "is a physical event with ontic validity". Rather, it holds the property "is a mental occurrence". The major difference between the two, from my point of view, being that mental occurrences are emergent phenomena coming from physiological events, rather than being physical themselves they are the result of the physical. Still part of the One, but not experienced by all parts in the same way.
He's so completely wrong about everything
It's astounding
So is ‘the One’ just the theoretical ‘set of all sets’?
so, big debate time: does the notion of 'the All' 'the One' 'the Absolute' have validity for describing things 'within' it?
Are you telling me that the physical and metaphysical do not fucking affect each other
@Shane unlike some folks here I'm not going to just call you a black jew, I'm actually responding to what you said, if you would prefer for me to just call you names then tell me.
Don't ask him he'll explain three words in a fuckin novel
@Major Slow tell us how you would “save the world” with a trillion dollars again
@Shane no, I did not say that physical and nonphysical things do not effect each other. Nowhere in my post was that said.
Political capital, think tanks, assassination
How can things that aren't real affect things that are real
<:aragourd:619649633936736256>
A friggin trillion m8
You're really good at not reading between the lines of your own words
Respond to what I say, not what you think I am trying to say.
You're really good at saying a lot but meaning nothing