Message from @Dorieus
Discord ID: 647936340331200523
that doesnt mean what it seems like you're saying. which i cant even tell if its your words tbh bc you learned from from
we see babylon being referred to
and then when it reemerges
that person you like
lol
people are referring to it as chaldea
do you just not know what aratta is then
or
i cant tell how this isnt getting across
@Departure
Because discord is made by pajeets
<:tickled:619648134561267723>
ok like aratta has nothing to do with babylon
it was part of southern mesopotamia
which babylon was the head of
but its not babylon
Babylon itself took the place of Sumer
southern mesopotamia is often thought of as babylonia
It's literally the replacement
it predates sumeria
cuz u had two major cities in mesopotamia
akkad, the capital of northern mesopotamia
and babylon
including this state
babylon
the capital of southern
babylon is post sumer
Babylon? Yeah no. Akkadians took Sumer, and that's when they got the babylonian culture
they transfer ownership to uruk
and only because of this
it existed during sumerian times
does babylon and other states
ever get to come into being
but lived long after sumeria
as a mix between Semitic and Sumerian religion
Sumer*** @sky daddy
you say they arent related but
that isnt really
considerate of time
and how things moved within it
or through it