more like because of faults in rhetorical form, making it hard to discern actual points in the documentary itself

it would go from "this document talks about coverups of ritual sacrifice" and the next sentence was "THIS IS WHY ALL JEWS SHOULD BE EXILED FROM WESTERN CIVILIZATION, BUT NOT GIVEN THEIR OWN COUNTRY, BUT NOT GENOCIDED..." as ways to save face while still trying to be as angry as possible

Well I mean I get where you're coming from, but is that really a poor recommendation?

The JQ has been an incessant Western complaint since Europe's Pagan antiquity

And the charges against thet Jews, before Europe was even unified, have always been the same

Those charges are still the same today, and are even more factually substantiated than they could have been in antiquity

That conclusion is one of common sense, even if you may not particularly like it.

i was reading more about the culture war for my essay yesterday, and literally on the wikipedia page is a link for "cultural marxism" that dives into all the sources of critical theory and frankfurt school stuff you were talking about

Ye

it didn't source any of its info, but i thought it was a funny coincidence

The Wiki page for Cultural Marxism?

https://web.archive.org/web/20160307074606/http://loonybird.com/cultural_marxism.htm

nah it was a source at the bottom of the culture war page

it has references at the bottom, but not as easily accessible like wikipedia's citations

Well, you're gonna have to actually *read* the papers and history on the Frankfurt School before you understand the weight of the criticism

The literature is like a confusing and poisonous maze. Befitting for the literature of Jews ofc

If you're sensible, marking the bullshit should come easy

Start with Eros and Civilization

Its very obviously concealed utopian marxism

Through the lens of sexual liberation

That book was prominent during the sexual revolution

I need to go for a bit but Im going to give you some parting wisdom

It takes longer to answer most of these questions, fully and truthfully and accurately, than it does to ask the question itself

When I say *Kikes need to be deported because of their shit*

I say it with all of the minutae Ive scraped through throughout the last eight years firmly in mind.

Because it is taxing reviewing **every** example into infinity as to why this is the case

Just like with race and IQ. These are all little things that paint a working picture of a whole. Piecing them together again and again in discourse is time consuming. So do yourself a favor and read.

i know you're very well read on the topic, but providing sources and stuff is kinda essential to the discourse unless we're just gonna talk about philosophy

Ye ofc. Im a bundle of sources

eventually i'll have to read more into cultural marxism since im working on breaking down the culture war

But all things are multilayered, even the JQ

and why value structures differ so much based on geography

But youre going to keep bumping into it whenever you read about cultural marxism et al

Its unavoidable

And if youre honest with yourself, you will eventually start studying Jews as a historical phenomenon, and you will discover the origin of 80% of these liberal reformative ideas

*and why value structures differ so much based on geography*

Because they tend to differ with race and culture, but 🤸 😩

as long as the docs arent vitriolic and full of faults in their rhetoric i can pretty much read anything

Well, what you call faults is just language you dont particularly like

well according to modern psychological models that isnt exactly true

culture maybe if culture breaks down on similar value structures

Also, I speak the same irl as I do in text. Fuck shit nigger etc. Point gets accross. The truth matters more than the way you convey it tbh.