👏

its rather a complex issue to define kind of
basically, modernism has been a disaster and has wrecked social order and values, tradition has worked for many centuries etc

the sexual revolution has wrecked the dynamics of men and women ,i'm against that
feminism has done the same, i'm against that

let me see if i can define it in more better way, its kinda hard to because i'm still cloudy headed

heres a little tidbit
Traditional values are not accidental. They are non-ideological social adaptations that provide good solutions to complex social problems. Cultures separated by vast amounts of time and geography independently converged on similar values. Values converged because cultures that implemented these values had a competitive advantage over their neighbors and became civilizations. Cultures that did not implement them failed and are forgotten.

Neoreactionaries acknowledge the legitimate flaws inherent to Democracies and are “predisposed, in any case, to perceive the politically awakened masses as a howling irrational mob, it conceives the dynamics of democratization as fundamentally degenerative: systematically consolidating and exacerbating private vices, resentments, and deficiencies until they reach the level of collective criminality and comprehensive social corruption.”

THOMAS GOODRICH AUTHOR OF HELLSTORM TONIGHT 8PM CENTRAL!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPeEyivaNos

@The Harsh Reality stop spamming or i put you in the cuck box

There's nothing more enticing than an all-caps advertisement of a virtually unknown bint.

Just makes you want to click that link and watch the whole video.

where do the deported go anyways lol

No deported came back to tell the tale.

They get sent to the other side of The Wall

@𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 𝕲𝖗𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖉𝖉𝖉𝖞 that was a very interesting take on traditionalism

what do you mran by "he sexual revolution has wrecked the dynamics of men and women " i was just wondering

You confused me to @Bee

you dont have to have a lengthy response, i understand that can take time

i just want to understand

Well, in case you don't know, the sexual revolution was the time when the contraceptives were first invented, in the 80s I think, because 80s people are retards, they though that by taking the pill they would never need to worry about having sex ever again, and they began fucking everyone to eveything

Nah @Rasin , I'm saying that you confused me to @Bee , the Traditionalist is him not me

o

oh

it says traditonalist in your roles

whops

mb nevermind

anyway ... so you dont like the idea of contraception?

and promiscuity?

Of course, because fucking everyone and everything without concern leads to diseases, eveyone got AIDs and other sexual diseases, so they got fucked

But there wasn't just that in the Revolution

so do you mind promiscuity done with protection?

to avoid those diseases

i agree un protected sex is not a good idea

The feminists and liberals from that time argued that the invention of the contraception would liberate the true sexuality of the female, by eliminating the patriarchal roles of the Domestic Mother and the Working Father, basically

There's no Traditionalist on my roles, as I said you confused me with Krabs

yea i did that was mb sorry

but going back, i was asking if you have a problem with promiscuity if its done safely?

i think one point at a time is easy to digest

@Rasin basically, the sexual revolution like i said messed up the dynamics of the sexes
hook up culture has made it where the bottom 80% of females try to acquire the top 20% of males
promiscuity for women wrecks their uhh, forgot the term give me a sec
but basically, its been proven that the more sexual partners a woman has before marriage, the more likely she'll divorce her married partner
which will break down the family

PAIR BONDING

thats the word

it wrecks their pair bonding ability

its also bad for men also

what is a bottom female?