<:thonk:520003926381166597>

Another way of saying races

well no

because races don't account for genetic groupings

the theory of race predates our knowledge of genetics

The political implication is actually more clear than the biological one..... Biologically it's a spectrum.... Politically it's more clearly categorical

and genetic groupings go beyond race

race is too broad of a category to efficiently group genetics

I just proved to you there are genetic groupings by geographic origin

You're just saying nothing at this point just deny it

well, that's true, but they're not based on race

Why is this even a thing?

Race is the political way of discussing those differences

Debating online

Kinda dumb

The political phrase race.... Is a way to combine the physical origin and ethnic contribution of that race into one group

well, it might be a method for you but its an inefficient method, because genetic diversity exists within racial categories

Obviously

You are just denying what is obvious because of dogma

this isnt dogma again this is basic genetics

genetics arent grouped by race

Because if you were to embrace what I'm saying is true you would have to re-evaluate your legalistic view of nationalism

what you're saying isnt true because

you dont seem to understand that

genetics vary beyond physical appearance

Basic genetics have already proved there are differences in the human population that are genetically clustered around geographic regions.... Fancy way of saying race

africans dont all have the same genetic background

So you're just going to keep denying it

No one said they're all the same within the race

no, again

because race doesnt account for full genetic backgrounds

Not racist

its an inefficient method

Now you're just trying to reduce what I'm saying to an absurd generality

its too focused on appearance

Racism is fake

Sexism is fake

You're all over the place here

Made up myths

so like

i can pull a person from south africa and a person from nigeria