^

they're worse than race-mixers

also that

is that it?

your reason for why its bad is because they cant reproduce? why even care about them then since they'll die off anyway

it is also a stimulus for depression and other disorders, even in societies that accept homosexuality

homosexuality spreads through faggots fucking children

it is not good for anyone, even homosexuals themselves

but i thought gender was not a social construct

🤔

how is this point counter to the idea that gender is not a social construct

@neztharion

Arguing against using consensus as your sole metric does not mean I think their evidence should be thrown out the window. ideology can blind someone and make them draw different conclusions off of the same data, or make them interpret it differently.

I'm calling a fallacy, not saying you shouldn't go through a scientific process.

Here is the problem with your argument:
We once believed homosexuality was a mental illness. It was once the scientific consensus. By the standard you have set, they must have been right.

if you get raped by some queer as a kid you're gonna be all messed up because of it

he edited his comment

Why is it that so many fags were sexually abused as children?

most fags were abused as children

that's how they become fags

sure, i agree, an appeal to authority isnt a valid argument

you have stats to back that up?

faggotry also commonly originates from insulated hypermasculine aggression

Which is why it is common in prison systems

not only that but that's a large claim that also wouldn't be limited to one area in earth

>an appeal to authority isnt a valid argument
>except when that authority agrees with me

but at the same time its difficult not to draw the conclusion that gender is socially constructed when academics overwhelmingly conclude that

youd have to survey all homosexuals on earth

i'd rather gas them all

i have no good reason to go against that opinion

>academics

What? That's Not how you science

well, im not a scientist, conducting a scientific experiment

>science is decided by consensus

bruh moment

You need a representative sample, not survey everyone

academics and any other member of the ruling class are the LAST people you should go to

yes its not like science has been decided by individuals that contribute against the consesus

remember when man thought they couldn't fly

men can't fly, they created machines that can fly

Yeah

Breakthroughs have to be made by individuals but science is decided by consensus and is set up to allow that consensus to be broken. This is brainlet-tier.

again whilst i agree that authority isnt a valid reason, being a minority opinion isnt either

a lot of science went against the consensus at the time