Message from @Senestic
Discord ID: 431019109413814272
And that a statement may either describe it, or it may not?
As well as statements that don't correspond directly to any real thing, but help to model the behavior of real things?
Reality, of its nature, isn't axiomized; we are, and we can use the axioms to describe reliable and unbreakable rules of behavior, which, while not actually existing, simply describe the things and their behaviors?
What method will result in statements that actually describe how reality is, in a way that we have no way of being wrong about, and being aware that this is case about that particular statement, thus making the statement knowledge? I haven't the slightest notion.
you are gay
Probably.
It's a yes or no answer
That doesn't make me wrong.
you're wrong
Maybe.
poop
I don't know. I don't know if I know anything.
Christ I've been watching too much Carnedes.
I havent been on this server for veeeeeeeeery long now.... Lets see how many that can type in the chat @SmartBoiYT
It's 3 in the morning my man.
only 2am for me
Fuck I need sleep
Nit fegs
ur a fig
@Soapie 🖤 No. There is no "external reality" you fig. Reality is the creation of the mental model. You're just a Cartesian.
The Cartesians believed that you could divide reality into mind and reality. In my view, no too things can exist in such a juxtaposition because they must share a common substrate; reality. Thus mind and reality are not irreducibly separate.
They share the same datamorphism.
Come with me, and we will together build the ultimate model of reality possible.
Join my friend Matt Acutt
He also thinks like a Cartesian.
gay
@memed me?
yes you
WRONG
i cant be wrong
cause you admitted it already
You don't exist.
Thus I am still right.
I'm an intellectual troll
See my syntax.
Wot
@Maveranne#0123 like you're not real either. You don't get to decide on your own existence. Remember, reality equals syntax and if language says you don't exist that is the truth, truth being axiomatic.