Message from @yureiNeko
Discord ID: 534905032865480742
i hate when people reference the first amendment to private spheres
I dont
the same people who have a hard on for private businesses having jurisdiction over their own property, also bitch when alex jones gets banned from youtube
Some private spheres shpuld be fprced to cover it
they had every right to
Like where
Twitter facebook and other such socal media seen as a new foarm of expression
I get more upset when people either confuse things in the amendments or don't get what they mean. Like this kid I'm talking to, he keeps confusing petitioning and protesting with free speech.
What?
Thats dumb
I mean even free speech has it's own drawn exceptions
Exactly.
Yes
If freedom of speech/expression didn't have exceptions, child porn would be legal
Its perficly ballanced
because that could fall under freedom of expression
Porn doesn't fall under that.
Why not
Fruty thats a bad argument
No porn is protected
Privacy is another one of those.
Porn is absolutely protected under the first amendment
It's protected, just not by the first amendment.
Im not a fan of the new justice due to his veiws on the 4th amentment
Same.
Eveeyone hating him for bullshit
I have a reason
I have a few reasons, but a lot of them are things people can't agree on.
just read part of the conversation and fruity going "call h- sorry there was a spider" has been the most relatable thing I've seen in weeks
sorry to barge in lmao
Yea tbh thats relatible
I can't remember exactly what the drawn exceptions are to the first amendment
The first amendment dose not accept anything brutaly grotesque
I mean gore sites are legal
No laws agenst them... yet
Gore is a bit different depending on what kind of site you're talking about.
Yeah so it isn't 100% absolute
If it's something like BestGore then it's completely legal because it offers a form of news.
Yeah the bill of rights is all like that. That's why it has so many problems, it's so vague that you can interpret it in various ways.