Message from @Goodwood of Dank™

Discord ID: 640031697194188800


2019-11-02 03:34:20 UTC  

> River.

2019-11-02 03:34:27 UTC  

> River.

2019-11-02 03:34:36 UTC  

> River.

2019-11-02 03:34:43 UTC  

> River.

2019-11-02 03:34:50 UTC  

> River.

2019-11-02 03:34:52 UTC  

There needs to be a difference in elevation. Big wall is called the dam. Hole at bottom of dam is where water come out back into other water. Inside that wall is turbine, water come down through dam and push turbine.

2019-11-02 03:35:06 UTC  

You seem to fail to realise that you need a river.

2019-11-02 03:35:17 UTC  

I know you're angry at your own stupidity from how fast you copy and paste. <:KEKW:596245670428409856>

2019-11-02 03:36:23 UTC  

> One of the best places for building a dam is a narrow part of a deep river valley

2019-11-02 03:36:25 UTC  

The river is only ever needed if there is no pump to refill the reserve.

2019-11-02 03:36:49 UTC  

That is why that exists, because no other hydro plant has pumps to refill itself.

2019-11-02 03:37:06 UTC  

It's self-sustaining, and can be built anywhere.

2019-11-02 03:37:16 UTC  

No, that's false

2019-11-02 03:37:21 UTC  

Explain why then.

2019-11-02 03:37:23 UTC  

If you read anything I linked, you'd know that.

2019-11-02 03:37:27 UTC  

damn dams

2019-11-02 03:37:39 UTC  

I'm not reading full wikipedia articles you haven't read, Weez.

2019-11-02 03:38:06 UTC  

Goodwood pls.

2019-11-02 03:42:29 UTC  

"I'm not going to read evidence you've linked me that disproves my argument"

2019-11-02 03:42:31 UTC  

Alright, bye.

2019-11-02 03:42:41 UTC  

What evidence?

2019-11-02 03:42:58 UTC  

I am informed about hydroelectricity.

2019-11-02 03:43:43 UTC  

What you have said ignores the core ideas of what you actually need to generate power, which, very little of your dams cited actually do.

2019-11-02 03:45:35 UTC  

My argument is that the UK can build hydroelectric dams wherever need the sea via man-made lakes and dams, generate during the day, and refill via pump at night. On a large scale, it would offset fossil fuels better than any other renewable energy they're trying to push.

2019-11-02 03:46:01 UTC  

And it would create more jobs than any other fuel but oil and nuclear.

2019-11-02 03:47:07 UTC  

Enjoy being ignorant to facts, EU shill.

2019-11-02 03:48:49 UTC  

Your argument fails to address that there's a net loss of energy 🤷

2019-11-02 03:48:58 UTC  

Hence, rivers are used 🤷

2019-11-02 03:49:05 UTC  

Which aren't everywhere in the world

2019-11-02 03:49:11 UTC  

And which aren't all suitable for use

2019-11-02 03:49:24 UTC  

Hence why they're called hydroelectric storage.

2019-11-02 03:49:56 UTC  

> Enjoy being ignorant to facts
Ironic coming from someone that doesn't know what energy loss is

2019-11-02 03:50:09 UTC  

you need a lot of head for a dam, and pumping is not a option unless you are using it as a energy storage not a source.

2019-11-02 03:50:36 UTC  

I just explained before the link spam how Canadian hydroelectric dams work.

2019-11-02 03:50:38 UTC  

Even then, there's a net energy loss. @DEPChimp

2019-11-02 03:51:43 UTC  

yep, there is tidal energy, that can be used but from what i understand you need a lot of coastline.