Message from @whiic
Discord ID: 641439427461382155
Kirk is on the losing side of the topic. He doesn't want to debate it, obviously.
“We need to have a conversation because without that we have war!”
But demanding "debate Fuentes" gives Kirk the option to reject it because of Fuentes **as a person**.
It gives him an easy path out of accepting critique.
So don’t debate him because he said some things you think is horrific?
Because of who he is as a person?
He's a nobody.
Who wants self-promotion.
He wants validation.
Then why did you bring him up?
Again
disliking someone isnt the same as cancel culture
u rart
Just drop it
neither is not talking to an unpopular dude
I didn’t say anything about cancel culture
```7:47 PM] Ford: I don't think anyone should embrace cancel culture
[7:47 PM] Ford: The left already does it```
read a tiny bit up
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
Well Groypers are calling not debating Fuentes "deplatforming".
**I didn’t say anything about cancel culture**
> ZOA Urges @Twitter to Remove White Supremacist and Holocaust Denier Nick Fuentes
Well they kicked him out
For no reason
Groypers are referring to cancel culture when they talk deplatforming.
Other than he was a “too hot of property”
You don't know the reasons.
Most of Conservative Inc are out to get him deplatformed and are shaming him for not conforming to their dogma
There is no reason
you have a handful, in a handful of tweets
oh boo hoo
Innocent until proven guilty?
Lemme play a sad song on the world's smallest violin
if anything
you idiots are doing cancel culture
Not to mention taking out of context clips of "holocaust denial"
guy makes a single mistake with regards to adherence to a principle, and not even a massive one, and yall saying he should now be "cancelled"
@Monstrous Moonshine What is the proper context then?