Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 640573712227106857
"To one consenting, no injury is done."
Contract law supercedes all other law, except in the case of immoral consideration. Again, I can't contract to murder a third party. This is why lovemaking isn't rape and BDSM isn't assault and battery.
and who is the main reason as to why you want to divorce your wife?
criminal law has different standards and rules from civil law
MA, it would depend on the specifics of the case. There are always exceptions to every rule, I'm just explaining the theory behind the procedure
Did the scam involve a good dicking?<:thunk:462282216467333140>
the man in question and his shaddy attorney used thos edifferences in his schemse
in a criminal proceeding, the state doesn't CARE about distinctions
Shaddy = shady x shoddy
yip
Explain to me what went on in this case.
brb
the guys ploy was to make some unsuspecting property owner an unintended bailee
he'd dump equipment at a property under the guise of doing work as a subcontractor of a 3rd party; then he'd leave it there and file a theft claim
he'd wait until insurance investigation then have another one of his shell companies go get the equip and after 6 mo, apply for a new title with another shelll company and sell it for profit
when i demanded to see paperwork of ownership, not knowing who or why equip was on my property, he obsecured his identity behind his wife in order to attempt to extort money
How did he obscure his identity behind his wife?
if someone comes onto your property and starts something, you never saw him before but you call the cops to have he removed for trespassing
Was the property in her name?
but he circumvented the cop and went straight to the da
Sounds like the DA didn't do his due dilligence, but continue
regardless if i KNEW that equipment was his wifes, it didn't matter; he has a legal right to be on my property
absolutely
DA is primary culprit
Dear god why can't the warren camp just die a quiet death.
@SageTheory Cuz you touch yourself at night
but this guy used the criminal system in order to prevent me from taking civil action
more importantly, prevent me from exposing his scam
Well, if he's claiming theft, that IS a criminal action, but he should have gone to the cops, not the DA, and the DA should have checked with the cops, since he would know he'd have to go through motions and discovery
he did; the cops were on MY side
the cheif of police was beside himself when it happend
Btw, your civil action IS a separate issue from his criminal complaint, but go on
it was even worse than that; in order to try to extort money from me, he had his wife hire an attorney using her madien name and issue me a letter
Did you tell her to fuck off?
trying to get me to do something in returning the equipment left on my property, documenting a good faith action while the husband out of left field made threats
using that ploy, he can act as either owner or innocent third party depending on what the victim of the ploy tries to do
So burden of prove lies with the accuser. What evidence did he have that it was stolen? Possession is 9/10s of the law, but the other is choses in action. So you said he had a reason to be on your property with equipment and I assume you had a written contract with him. The equipment was still there and he apparently knew it was, so the most reasonable course of action would be to tell him go get his stuff and you two break your contract. I'd be asking him tons of questions.
forged paperwork
How do you know it was forged?