the Roman Empire did better at feeding everyone and it was a monarchy <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Maybe if slavs worked instead of getting drunk on vodka they could get food too

Gommies only feed tgemselves

Bread and Circuses nigga

The Roman empire wasn't a moanarchy tho

For much of it's history the imperial totle wasn't hereditary

It was meritocratic

monarchies don't have to be hereditary

Often thryh either adoption

Or otherwise

oh they were getting too drunk to eat? where was their alcohol coming from?

Yeah they do lol

men don't become men, women don't become women until they are have to fight for something

no, not really.

Otherwise they're dictatorships

Yes relaly

what do you fight for?

From communism <:Stalinpic:527639234971041802>

^^ cancer

oh hey, look who's back

lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy#Elective_monarchies

@Lucienne d'Anwyl

its fun playing comrade with the resident communists

you better start taking care of your peers like Babey or you WILL regret it

Elective Monarchies are *absolutely* a thing

unless of course you like the thought of a gulag...

Commonwealth gang

or a camp

camp is far more likely

Commies were bad but they werent as bad as some think they were

@BabaBooey why did lenin strengthen the extractive intuitions and political systems rather than instilling inclusive intuitions?

@Tato, i can apply your statement to virtually everyone

the only zealot more obnoxious than dipshits preaching Pax Americana

@Tato communists are bad b.c they refuse to learn from their mistakes

it's relative; basically a socialist statment

No

yes

Commies were bad because they sent opposition to gulags