morals and responsibilities are directly related

can you stop being a walking contradiction?

only in your mind

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7592485/Father-eight-invents-electric-car-battery-drivers-1-500-miles-without-charging-it.html @ManAnimal

they are two different dimensions entirely

Ew

Electric "cars"

<:poggers:583775485620781087>

one stems from ACTION, moral or otherwise

being *irresponsible* is *immoral*

Now the climate activists can glue themselves to the cars roo

Too

following *morals* is part of your *responsibility*

that's a circle-jerk

no lel

More like road-going abortions

After all electric bad!

that isn't morality

MA

being irresponsible is not being immoral

<:slurpgon:583424900732157956>

literally no1 agrees with your definition of morality

sorry,you have just lost your argument

no

tato, destroy that target

I made a tangential statement

Electric cars are ugly af

There isn't one definitive answer for morality

There are people who think morality is inherent and others who think it's constructed

the term is 'ethical'

not moral

Both are valid schools of thought

moral is a function of the individual

morals and ethics are linked

entirely subjective

Also

ethics are wider, social expecatations

no shit they are linked

ie. women problems

one is internal

the other is external