Which is why she wasn't suspected (not anyone was suspect for foul play) when the first victim died.

The family had like 20 people over

Only two lived

And they didn’t have kids

So basically he yeeted a bloodline

They didn’t have kids because it was possible the eggs of the girl would have cancer if become a child or something

So she didn’t want to take the chance of bringing in something so unfortunate

So yeah he yeeted a bloodline

At first they thought it was some new type of mega shit disease

Compassionate killing.

So the house looked like something off a horror film where the government quarantined it off. Swat, hazmat suits etc

It’s how he got fucked

The federal government got involved

Criminally wrong, but when you execute an elderly (non-productive) who was also developmentally retarded from birth (non-productive for their entire history), it's easy to view such a person as nothing but a burden to society.

Maybe even as alleviating the suffering of the person killed.

Basically so successful at hiding his tracks at first with weird symptoms that he got more attention and resources after him

On accident

Well the reason I have problems with those lines of thought is that people have emotional attachments to the elderly

Well, those emotional attachements vary.

Humans aren’t logically creatures and aren’t units of consumption and production

True true

Sometimes the relatives would just want their parents to die.

Not because they hate them, but because they don't want them to suffer.

Yeah that always gets difficult

Questions like that

There is still the concept of "dignified death", and that even voluntary euthanasia is usually a crime.

I'm not really a fan of involuntary euthanasia conducted by a lone "SJW" of sorts.

I don’t think anyone is

But there's still legalized state-run euthanasia of sorts in Finland. While it's illegal for an elderly or terminally ill patient to request aid in committing suicide, the state can order a non-resuscitation order on an elderly without advising or even notifying the relatives.

Wtf?

That’s ass backwards

If you cannot have even aid to suicide, how is it right for the govt to order execution of an elderly without their approval?

It's nonsense. It is backward.s

Well there is always something wrong with a system in place

Thought it’s completely justified to be angry at that.

Sure, my grandma died while on non-advised, and non-notified non-resuscitation order. I wouldn't have objected to it since she had several strokes and was bedridden, and was a vegetable for a week. But it would be nice to at least know.

I did agree there was zero chance she cannot make it.

But when at the same time medical staff protect their sensibilities with Hippocratic oath so that they cannot assist on suicide **at request of the patient rather than the government**... that pure BS.

I mean, I wouldn't *force* any medical professional to assist on suicide, but when it's criminalized (asissting = murder) that is seriously fucked up... especially when while assisting = murder, committing literal murder is legal (if done by authorities who have the power to assert a non-resuscitation order against patients will).

I’m sorry about that man

Sucks