Sucks

Anyway I’m going to head out

I hope things get better for you

That's like a decade in past.

I'm over that.

And like I said, I actually agree with non-resuscitation in her case. She live a loooooong life.

I just think it's a hypocrisy that govt can order non-resuscitation (regardless of patients will), but the patient itself cannot ask for help to commit suicide.

It is hypocritical

I agree.

That’s not something you think it’s provable

I guess they avoid "hypocrisy" by differentiating that non-resuscitation (even if against patients will) is non-action, where as assisting suicide is action (even if with patients agreement).

So they use a technicality of action vs in-action.

To justify basically functioning as executioners while refusing actual mercy killing on request of the person **ITSELF** (rather than govt).

Hippocratic oath is cancer.

Doctors argue for it's merits because with Hippocratic oath, the govt cannot command them to Holocaust (only order them to not resuscitate Jews shot by non-doctors). The cost of this "moral backbone" is that doctors cannot alleviate pain with morphine if it risks sleeping away, or cause death even at request of being granted death.

I think doctors have a Holocaust-fear. And they don't really fear killing itself, just being made responsible of it. Doctos are cowardly people without backbone.

Which is probably why lawyers and doctors are both at the center of biggest bloated public spending infrastructures, and without any moral dilemma of whether the world would be better if they killed themselves on the spot.

Pat @whiic

Why?

The Hippocratic oath feels a lot like Baby Hitler dilemma.

There's a legitimate question of whether killing baby Hitler would have saved the Jews (and Polacks, and French, and all the rest who died in WW, incl. Germans).

However: going all Ben Shapiro and refusing to **PERSONALLY** kill baby Hitler, is cowardice.

Youtube's agenda is to help the gays, and not the youtube community..

~~~
101Million subs, probably the single most famous person on the internet@ pewdiepie isn't verified , yet.. James Charles, some guy with only 16M who wears makeup and I only know about because of the accusations of him assaulting straight men still is... #Logic #GoFigure @ YouTube.
~ https://twitter.com/TRFCedd/status/1175039645219991552

If you refuse to kill baby Hitler because Hitler might be better than the unknown that would have replaced him (since anti-semitism pre-existed Hitler), that is a valid argument. Hitler did after all, lose the war.

Hitler developed the second greatest weapon ever used- a trainful of communism

If he hadn't been around who knows what the warhead could have done

But to refurse to kill baby Hitler (one person) in hypothetical argument to save tens of millions, that is retarded, and I want Ben Shapiro court-martialed and executed.

For treason.

Hitler was killed for opposing communism.

And Sargon as well for entertaining Shapiros cuck position on sparing Hitler.

@BrandonChimaria (｡◕‿◕｡✿) Kinda correct. Since if he had not invaded Russia, Hitler would have conquered Britain.

He could have "won" the war if he had played his alliance with Soviets longer. A lot longer.

The only reason Soviets attacked Germany, because Russia was going to take Europe...

That is why Germany attacked the offensive.

Take it with what

Yeah, he too the initiative since **EVENTUALLY** Russia would have backstabbed him if he didn't do it first.

How many years would that have taken... probably 1 or 2 at most.

I still don't understand your argument that "Hitler was killed for opposing communism."

Would have served Hitler much better to have used the time to harden up

Hitler did one good thing: Hitler killed Hitler.

kill baby von Hötzendorf