Message from @wotmaniac
Discord ID: 627237817499516928
To the point that carnivorism is animal protection.
um, i know there's an argument that says that you would necessitate an total genocide every livestock animal if we all go vegan
And that's the most retarded of all arguments.
i'm just saying it's out there
You could just ban breeding new ones and eat the current, already existing ones.
tru
Yet, I've heard that argument several times.
but now we have several more species that are now extinct.
i thought greenies were all about the biodiversity?
Errrr... now we havE?
And how are greenies responsible of extinction?
I don't think a couple of breeds of cows, pigs and chicken count much of biodiversity. There are countless breeds of "chicken" in the nature. In captivity, only few.
It's just that domesticated chicken have a greater biomass than all the wild chicken combined.
it's not my hill - i was just throwing it out there
I'm not on my hill either. I'm not a vegan. I'm just playing devil's advocate because I think some counterarguments are pure retardation.
i'm also not too awfully familiar with the "vegetarianism kills animals" reasoning ... but let me see if i can intuit it......
Anyway, I think I'll bail out this discussion and go torture myself with my favorite conservative lolcow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvqGVJE6i2s
.... land set aside for livestock is actually has functioning ecosystems on them. if it ain't actively aggressing the livestock, then everything goes along just fine.
however, that land (and more) would have to be converted to crop land, which *is* managed to keep everything else out
destruction of ecosystems
Watching the cringiest conservative make mockery of the cringiest climate alarmist... what could go wrong?
I really am a masochist to watch that shit...
and a puppet
So is No Bullshit.
and i find it disgusting that these leftists keep trotting out children to parrot their propaganda, thinking it will immunize them to critisism
...and after complaining about Mini-AOC.
If the left didn't have double-standards, they wouldn't have standards at all.
... but if they're gonna trot someone out to have big-boy/girl convos, then those puppets are gonna be treated like big boys/girls
But then they cry bullying.
That is their plan.
if it's "too much to do to a kid", then their script writers are guilty of reckless endangerment
moral of the story: keep your kids at home and make better arguments
They rely on audience to not understand that Greta is a pawn in leftist game.
Which is why Sargon's take is probably the right one: **ignore her**.
but it's painfully obvious
yes, i barely only saw her "speech" just today.
i could see the game a mile away
ignore her
just like that david kid over the gun control thing
nothing but naked shameless appeals to emotion, devoid of real contextualized facts.
If you argue her arguments, you validate her as an opponent.
If you argue her as an opponent, you attack a child (as we don't know who's her "handler" with certainty to target them directly).
Ignore her, and you avoid both traps.