Message from @yordanyordanov

Discord ID: 626035311125725185


2019-09-24 12:36:26 UTC  

Certainly.

2019-09-24 12:36:35 UTC  

As I said, all Communist regimes must devolve into fascism to survive.

2019-09-24 12:36:36 UTC  

This is why there is a stagnation there now.

2019-09-24 12:36:37 UTC  

Anyway I gtg

2019-09-24 12:37:02 UTC  

I say-give it 20 or 30 years and you would see them degrade back to feudalism.

2019-09-24 12:37:13 UTC  

Alright, take it easy, Py.

2019-09-24 12:37:13 UTC  

Problem is feudalism is stable as hell,

2019-09-24 12:37:35 UTC  

precisely because it kills innovation, and therefore the opposition to it.

2019-09-24 12:37:35 UTC  

Good luck selling that to the world. <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-09-24 12:37:57 UTC  

Indeed, Yord.

2019-09-24 12:38:13 UTC  

And may be eventually all fascism would devolve to some form of feudalism.

2019-09-24 12:38:55 UTC  

Rate of innovation is also aligned with a scale of economic freedom, which positively correlates with the amount of freedom within a particular market.

2019-09-24 12:39:01 UTC  

And here is where it gets really creepy because without an external force to actually threaten the status quo such a form of fascism can sustain itself virtually indefinitely.

2019-09-24 12:39:05 UTC  

So, different economic systems have varying rates of innovation, with the greatest freedom having the highest rate.

2019-09-24 12:39:22 UTC  

I go further than that @Jeremy

2019-09-24 12:39:57 UTC  

It wouldn't because fascism is very centralistic

2019-09-24 12:39:57 UTC  

It is my most controversial statement but I go by it-stable societies KILL innovations.

2019-09-24 12:40:15 UTC  

It just gets in the way for their stability to properly function.

2019-09-24 12:40:29 UTC  

Correct, Yord.

2019-09-24 12:40:34 UTC  

You require creative destruction.

2019-09-24 12:40:49 UTC  

Stable societies LOVE conservatism, but in the worse sense.

2019-09-24 12:41:03 UTC  

It is that pursuit of an absolute stability which consumes the chaos that should be wielded in balance, neither to consume the other.

2019-09-24 12:41:10 UTC  

Order|Chaos

2019-09-24 12:41:40 UTC  

They occupy a particular societal equilibria where all the forces acting on a collective are perfectly balanced and the firmer the balance, the less the innovation.

2019-09-24 12:41:59 UTC  

Indeed.

2019-09-24 12:42:02 UTC  

I like your thinking @Jeremy

2019-09-24 12:42:07 UTC  

I have similar ideas.

2019-09-24 12:42:36 UTC  

I love the science of complexity-if you ever heard of it cause most scientists would tell you there is no such a thing,

2019-09-24 12:42:39 UTC  

This was fundamental behind the idea of our Constitutional Republic.

2019-09-24 12:42:46 UTC  

This simple concept.

2019-09-24 12:42:47 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/613769167199535104/626035805445685277/Screenshot_410.png

2019-09-24 12:43:25 UTC  

but I believe the best systems are the ones who implement chaos to the furthest degree possible.

2019-09-24 12:43:57 UTC  

You get best results not when you have a strict immovable hierarchies but when you have the best **controlled** chaos.

2019-09-24 12:44:12 UTC  

👏🏻

2019-09-24 12:44:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/613769167199535104/626036158618533889/JBP_lobster.jpg

2019-09-24 12:44:25 UTC  

I believe this is true everywhere-biology, society, the battlefields, even medicine.

2019-09-24 12:44:35 UTC  

You're on your way to earning your Scottish Rite.

2019-09-24 12:44:43 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-09-24 12:44:44 UTC  

But when you tell it to a common bloke he thinks you are insane.

2019-09-24 12:45:01 UTC  

Of course.

2019-09-24 12:45:03 UTC  

What is Scottish Rite?