Message from @yordanyordanov
Discord ID: 626048141149339658
If we tried to tackle the math head on, it'd have been impossible
@Hexidecimark Well, what was the topic of the paper?
What model did you start with?
Real time AI based on cube computing is the full paper
The sub-paper we were doing was a facet of cube, and we started from scratch and a pile of information on computing
I'm not really a computer scientist @Hexidecimark
I'm sorry if I can't get something.
It's no problem
By profession my field is biology, especially the fundamental one
And by extension-complexity, thou I don't know how to exactly define it yet.
Well, it's kind of order out of chaos but I think you understand one can't really name it, right?
Right now I am trying to link some of my ideas to the inner working of economic cycles theory.
For you, I would say...
Take order out of chaos, aye?
So we have that. Now we can break it down by a step. Think of some examples, and then consider- what can represent the most general, barebones version of these examples?
You know-the missing super theory of economics?
I would think of a broom
Do you know about the works of Kondratiev and Smihula?
When you sweep with the broom, there is more distance covered when the bristles are longer
Can't say I do
I'm quite literally trying to build a theory of progress on my own, and I had soem quite interesting revelations here.
It is actually very interesting when you look at economy through the lenses of origins of life/astrobiology perspective.
I'm not a fan of the Kondratiev wave right off the bat
I entirely agree that the economies are just like living creatures and they have a will on their own.
Actually if you read more on the topic @Hexidecimark you would realize there is more than meets the eyes.
Some of the way that it frames things seems... off somehow
Smihula seems at once like a better means of representing something to me
The way you can make cycle theory works is by considering the fact that there are these periods when innovation can give you higher NPVs for the same investment that others.
It is actually quite simple-there are these breakthroughs which create new industries, like the computer for example.
And if you put money in this sector you can expect faster returns than in any other sector.
This is why capital tend to flow into them.
This helps them grow and they can provide even greater returns with the new capital they accumulate until they reach a technological barrier of some kind where the return diminishes.
At which point you need new tech to start things back up
There is just no way the same profit margins can be extracted out of the sector any more and the people start loosing money instead of gaining them.
However there is already tension build in the economy because people don't know the highest point of the cycle has been reached yet.
It is very difficult to determine it actually.