Message from @Louis
Discord ID: 622501240038883328
Lol gives me ptsd
then there's a small net force you absolute retard
if the force on top is an entire building, and the force below is the reaction, and the beam has been heated to 1500-odd degrees
it'll ***bend***
now if that's every single beam on three floors
there's gonna be ***a little bit*** of a problem
1500 or so odd degrees you say>
let me go fucking check for you, you faggot
Jet fuel can't melt stupid cancerous conversations about 9/11.
Inb4 twin towers was built with plastic
Exhibit A. Spec describing temp at which standard jet fuel is capable of burning
"Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F"
lol. Discuss in voice chat so we can hear your autism.
oki so it was F not C
whatever
as well as number of BTUs such a fire is capable of expending
the point is that it's hot enough for the beams to be weakened
yes, correct. it is not
Wut
no more so than if there was a cat-3 hurriucane that day
Any fucking heat weakens metal
and the specs show it was designed to acoomidate cat-5 winds
i said hot enough, not "not enough" you nigger
Why don't we try to recreate it properly
i.e. on a windy day the top of such a building would see FAR more strain than any fire could every hope to provide
why don't we accept that intense heat weakens metal
FIRE
Why don't we let these two lovebirds fuck it out of each other.
DOESN'T CAUSE STRAIN
IT REDUCES THE STEEL'S TOLERANCE FOR STRAIN
strain is lateral loading
yea
please review your finite element analysis
there was lateral loading when the building leaned
Lol not even steel
static, not dynamic
fucking
Bet it was made like grenfell