Message from @ManAnimal

Discord ID: 623190104911118336


2019-09-16 16:12:46 UTC  

for sure man

2019-09-16 16:12:54 UTC  

@King Canuck gimme da link

2019-09-16 16:12:55 UTC  

pls

2019-09-16 16:13:07 UTC  

i believe he eluded to atleast being aware of this on some level, tho forgive me if i dont scry for a direct quote

2019-09-16 16:13:09 UTC  

What's liberalist?

2019-09-16 16:13:11 UTC  

I have a zero tolerance attitude towards zer-tolerance

2019-09-16 16:13:19 UTC  

nihlism is valid only in the event there isn't balance between the person occupying the male role and those other roles which he must share resources with

2019-09-16 16:13:27 UTC  

@Ares a rare form of cancer

2019-09-16 16:13:29 UTC  

i will forgive him for not prophesizing over a hundred years into the future

2019-09-16 16:13:57 UTC  

~60 was impressive enough

2019-09-16 16:13:57 UTC  

Listen, this may shock *no one* but I got bullied the shit out of for being different when young
but I got into so many fights because fucking whores kept attacking me, with rocks, sticks, textbooks, fuckin hockey sticks, fuckin DESKS and countless other shit

2019-09-16 16:14:06 UTC  

@Ares Sargon tried to start some liberal movement and subsequently abandoned it like a dumpster baby

2019-09-16 16:14:14 UTC  

females, males, literal retards. Count em all

2019-09-16 16:14:17 UTC  

Why?

2019-09-16 16:14:17 UTC  

well thats the issue allways with nihilism

2019-09-16 16:14:20 UTC  

the organization is slowly working on doing activism-y things in regards to talking liberal vlaues

2019-09-16 16:14:29 UTC  

Largely stangnant rn tho but they're nice peeps

2019-09-16 16:14:33 UTC  
2019-09-16 16:14:43 UTC  

it is valid, arguably the only valid available atleast with our current level of understanding

2019-09-16 16:14:47 UTC  

but it isnt servicable

2019-09-16 16:14:59 UTC  

not so sure if it is 'an issue'. It's more like the cost of a nessecary trade-off

2019-09-16 16:15:16 UTC  

thus we engage in a little fallacy right at the start before we do any of our thinking

2019-09-16 16:15:27 UTC  

or atleast the more intelligent will attempt to keep it to 1

2019-09-16 16:15:40 UTC  

ie. "humanity matters"

2019-09-16 16:15:48 UTC  

Question: would you be for the EU if it was super strict on national borders but it still wanted to become a federal government?

2019-09-16 16:15:50 UTC  

i.e. men get angry. they NEED to be allowed to do this and while sensitivity doesn't incur a cost in females, it is mutually exclsuive with strength

2019-09-16 16:16:15 UTC  

such is nihlism; it's the result of specialization

2019-09-16 16:16:21 UTC  

i am for EU already as is tbh

2019-09-16 16:16:29 UTC  

Id be for the eu if it went with the 25 points

2019-09-16 16:16:42 UTC  

Why are you for the EU as it is?

2019-09-16 16:17:03 UTC  

but that is entirely conceptual at its base level still

2019-09-16 16:17:14 UTC  

cause its pretty good and its gonna get better when we federalise

2019-09-16 16:17:18 UTC  

and build an army

2019-09-16 16:17:23 UTC  

i mean i am arguing at a level of truth analysis as opposed to attempting to direct/analuze the human condition

2019-09-16 16:17:37 UTC  

@Kealor a man who is aware of his limitations won't push himself as hard nor as long as a man who beleives he had no limitations and it is his duty to find a way even if it kills him

2019-09-16 16:17:50 UTC  

as i alluded to earlier, to a degree it should be dismissed before you attempt to do the above

2019-09-16 16:17:53 UTC  

But how can you support a system where the people you vote for don't do anything?

2019-09-16 16:17:56 UTC  

hence the 1 fallacy

2019-09-16 16:17:58 UTC  

guy verhofstadt is my spirit animal btw

2019-09-16 16:18:12 UTC  

fuck u

2019-09-16 16:18:15 UTC  

I'm being serious man