true

*But*

it's mostly from Latin America / 3rd world

and the benefit of it is that you can cap it when it gets too high (so you dont have homeless mexiniggers)

if you storm a border, i'd happily allow execution on site

and the other benefit

if its only legal immigration

is that you can exclude all the dumbasses

via citizenship tests

you're assuming America has any moral obligation to allow migrants in lmao

they dont

yeah its true

It doesn't

i never said they did

but they are also all immigrants so kinda irony

But most people don't mind immigrants

So they come in

i dont think any immigrant has the right to come in

if you dont allow immigrants thats pretty racist my dude

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

but they took the land by might, so therefore its theirs

i just see it as a net benefit up to a certain point

that point being the immigration cap

indians are cucks

native americans are fucking cucks tbh

yeah cap it at 10K per year and only take in those who will integrate in one generation and assimilate in two

10k?

actually 10K seems a bit high

in a country of 300million?

thats rather low

again

America has no obligation to take anyone in

thats like .001% immigration growth

for the uk i'd like 0 for a few years unless needed in industry

theres this thing called birthrates @Spooky Melon

^]

the goal should be to raise those

^

@Cadbal so if a swiss doctor decided to immigrate for whatever reason, you'd be against it?

not replace the current population