I studied Marxist doctrine throughout my educational endeavors, and it inevitably led to my solidification as a proponent of self-organization, henceforth economic and social freedom. If you understand their values, their dogmas, the irony is they're best served under the natural disposition of capitalism.

Marxist Economics is kina like Army Intelligence - it's an oxymoron

It's not a form of economic discipline, however.

It's merely criticism and conjecture.

Criticism and conjecture preying on and cultivating the envy of the audience, while simultaneously exploiting a knowledge-gap.

"Religion is the opiate of the masses"
T. Preacher

You can say some have good intentions, are fundamentally motived by altruism, but the prevailing force is always that of envy.

france stronk

Communism is literally the blob off the horror movie. It takes something complex like the human body, or in the case of this ideology, human society, and boils it down into soup. It’s against nation states, tradition, families, religion.

Take it easy, @Samaritan™.

"Imperch Troomp!

REEEE

National heritage and identity are bad

Marxism is essentially a kindergarten answer to the complexities of real-world economics

Marxism, more broadly, goes against human nature.

^

Not even economics

@UnfilteredGarbage didn't Marx write down that quote?

The economics are bad

There are no economics, Python.

What, the religion quote? Yes, that's the joke

I thought so.

But taking out nation states, heritage, culture, families religion

In the truly utopian state of Communism, there is no such thing.

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

He was the first neckbeard Atheist who thought he knew everything.

No, he really wasn't. He was just the first to publish his livejournal

^

The entirety of Marx's influence has been through the capital sale of his works

Let that sink in

Basically, yeah.

Communism wouldn't exist without Capitalism.

Actual communist states don't proliferate Marxist thought, because it would reveal their failures in attaining the Marxist ideal

That's because Communism doesn't actually work.

Hence the amount of information control and revisionism common in those nations

@Little Boots yup

Within the eyes of an economist, Communism's fundamental flaw is the requirement for both the supply of all labor and resources to be infinitely abundant. Scarcity will never be eliminated, and even if we do eliminate scarcity within labor and resources, you still have scarcity of time.

More than that, labor theory of value is just a race to the bottom

Thus, Communism as a natural progression will never be.