Message from @Kaiser (ICFD)

Discord ID: 607427384991547392


2019-08-04 04:17:03 UTC  

**eyes narrow** correct

2019-08-04 04:17:12 UTC  

So uh

2019-08-04 04:17:19 UTC  

otherwise, it becomes US vs THEM

2019-08-04 04:17:27 UTC  

If a woman gives birth to a living child that they raise, they can vote.

2019-08-04 04:17:34 UTC  

we are STUCK using the logic OR

2019-08-04 04:17:35 UTC  

If they abort then send them to Sweden.

2019-08-04 04:17:40 UTC  

rather than the logical AND

2019-08-04 04:17:41 UTC  

Yes

2019-08-04 04:18:10 UTC  

because if women are in the same 'lane' as men, then we DISPLACE each other's value

2019-08-04 04:18:17 UTC  

But seriously, women's suffrage just made them so exploitable :(

2019-08-04 04:18:34 UTC  

and as we compete for mates, we can't exactly DISCLOSE everything directly

2019-08-04 04:18:39 UTC  

Whyd they make it seem like voting is a right

2019-08-04 04:18:44 UTC  

It's so weird.

2019-08-04 04:18:53 UTC  

Why would you want to vote unless you want to manipulate it.

2019-08-04 04:18:59 UTC  

With your vaginas.

2019-08-04 04:19:00 UTC  

women have always been exploitable

2019-08-04 04:19:04 UTC  

The watering down of voting to a basic thing that everyone has rather than something earned is what made things shit

2019-08-04 04:19:12 UTC  

the diference was it couldn't be 'focused'

2019-08-04 04:19:13 UTC  

Net contributors should be able to vote and net takers should IE no wealth fare faggots begging for more handouts

2019-08-04 04:19:25 UTC  

that doesn't work either

2019-08-04 04:19:34 UTC  
2019-08-04 04:19:36 UTC  

if it did, we get no vote and the elites rule

2019-08-04 04:19:46 UTC  

the 'net contributors'

2019-08-04 04:20:01 UTC  

Again land owners should have a guaranteed vote, and married individuals should, and parents should.

2019-08-04 04:20:10 UTC  

that doesn't work either

2019-08-04 04:20:19 UTC  

land is out of reach for most zoomers

2019-08-04 04:20:23 UTC  

Basically, anyone with multi-generation stake in the country.

2019-08-04 04:20:24 UTC  

It’d be a basic net contribution that anyone not on welfare could make

2019-08-04 04:20:37 UTC  

and that will get worse as time goes one leading to more chances of the underclass revolting

2019-08-04 04:20:48 UTC  

The dems would decrease their base based on how successful they are with getting leftist welfare making a safe guard against turning into an increasingly leftist country

2019-08-04 04:20:58 UTC  

If the especially poor want to vote, they can join the military

2019-08-04 04:21:03 UTC  

The vote should require a person to have something they can lose over it, like something at risk.

2019-08-04 04:21:11 UTC  

doubtful, left doesn't use reason to make decisions

2019-08-04 04:21:16 UTC  

Not having land? Sure communism is delicious looking.

2019-08-04 04:21:26 UTC  

^^

2019-08-04 04:21:42 UTC  

No family? No reason to worry about the future.

2019-08-04 04:21:43 UTC  

hence why you can't 'focus' all the privledge

2019-08-04 04:21:51 UTC  

Its not that hard to pay more in taxes then you take in benefits and get the vote

2019-08-04 04:21:52 UTC  

No kids? Why care about anyone but myself.

2019-08-04 04:21:52 UTC  
2019-08-04 04:22:00 UTC  

it must remain a function of the individual's choice