Message from @whiic

Discord ID: 621140122750156822


2019-09-11 00:23:56 UTC  

They probably have superfagging access but is superflagging for mere comments or videos and entire channels?

2019-09-11 00:24:01 UTC  

Oh ok, so its more of a proxy type relationship. Hmm, I'm still unsure as to whether its blackmail or not. I don't think it is, Pewds is bigger than the site. There's no way that they could make him give them 50,000 to stay on YouTube or stay uncensored. He wouldn't do it. I think its more likely that he is just ignorant.

2019-09-11 00:24:20 UTC  

Because superflagging thousands of mere comments is like killing a fly with hydrogen bombs.

2019-09-11 00:24:30 UTC  

So, for any tuber who has massive following, it can be a tremendous opportunity cost to be on their bad side, as fewer advertisers will likely be comfortable using your channel

2019-09-11 00:24:50 UTC  

Superflagging is the shit where you could delete PDP's entire channel overnight.

2019-09-11 00:25:43 UTC  

They would only kill his channel if he doesn't capitulate. So far, he's been capitulating a lot, and trying to be very diplomatic.

2019-09-11 00:25:54 UTC  

Superflagging is the shit that gets Jihad Watch, etc. taken of the site without a single prior TOS strike.

2019-09-11 00:26:11 UTC  

It's a huge risk for them to take down such a large channel, because his presence could carry the popularity of another video hosting site if he left Youtube

2019-09-11 00:26:27 UTC  

But they can still do a lot to hurt him and disrupt his finances without taking him down

2019-09-11 00:26:52 UTC  

I know PDP is too big to fail. But I don't know of capitulating.

2019-09-11 00:27:07 UTC  

Mentioning donating to ADL (whether he did or not) is not capitalaiton.

2019-09-11 00:27:18 UTC  

Paying them is, mentioning he did is not.,

2019-09-11 00:27:27 UTC  

Obviously, PDP doesn't want to migrate to another platform, or he have already done so. So, they can just put pressure on him to not be too much of an edgiboi, and also to get essentially free money out of him.

2019-09-11 00:27:30 UTC  

All he did was tip off his viewers that shit is going on.

2019-09-11 00:27:36 UTC  

He wouldn't tolerate it though. As someone who has been on the site he would know in an instant if they tried to slowly strangle him. He'd make a vid about it and YouTube would pander to the outrage temporarily and if it didn't improve long term he'd leave the platform.

2019-09-11 00:28:01 UTC  

If you weigh how much he probably gets through revenue, compared to what he paid out, it's likely they can get an awful lot before he finally draws any kind of line in the sand.

2019-09-11 00:28:16 UTC  

He tipped off ADL extortion in a way that the MSM cannot accuse him of making up the conspiracy (because his viewers would make it on his behalf ... it's genius).

2019-09-11 00:28:34 UTC  

how?

2019-09-11 00:28:45 UTC  

MSM cannot use that as a means for call to deplatform since PDP never said ADL extorts.

2019-09-11 00:28:56 UTC  

And he can remain on Youtube, raking in the dough.

2019-09-11 00:29:05 UTC  

He couldn't make as much money on Bitchute.

2019-09-11 00:29:09 UTC  

hmm, i think this is getting into some 3d chess conspiracy area.

2019-09-11 00:29:12 UTC  

With the donation, which he made public. It's very suspicious. But at the same time, I wouldn't put it past him to just be that naive about what ADL really is, and think that it's good lamb's blood. Good optics.

2019-09-11 00:29:25 UTC  

@Miniature Menace What donation?

2019-09-11 00:29:27 UTC  

I guess time will tell

2019-09-11 00:29:39 UTC  

@Miniature Menace Is there proof there even was a donation?

2019-09-11 00:29:52 UTC  

He said he gave 50000 dollars to ADL but did he?

2019-09-11 00:30:11 UTC  

most likely he did

2019-09-11 00:30:23 UTC  

again, it's gay, but yall are throwing a fit

2019-09-11 00:30:25 UTC  

Well, maybe he did for plausible deniability.

2019-09-11 00:30:27 UTC  

unnecessarily so

2019-09-11 00:30:47 UTC  

You would have to verify that somewhere else. I don't have that info. I would assume that maybe he mentioned it himself, and that's what this is all about, but I may be wrong.

2019-09-11 00:30:58 UTC  

bruh

2019-09-11 00:30:58 UTC  

did

2019-09-11 00:30:59 UTC  

you

2019-09-11 00:31:00 UTC  

not

2019-09-11 00:31:01 UTC  

watch

2019-09-11 00:31:02 UTC  

the video

2019-09-11 00:31:04 UTC  

If there wasn't a cover-up of people mentioning ADL in the comments, one could admit the possibility of PDP being naive.

2019-09-11 00:31:12 UTC  

again

2019-09-11 00:31:17 UTC  

no evidence of cover up