I am saying , their religious beliefs don't actually mean the church, is officially involved.

The church or England is appointed in the house of lords.

a distinction without a difference

the result is the same, modern day democracy strongarmed by caveman superstition

I want that to remain. It means there is power and they have power in democratic process. And it means,..... NO IMAMS ALLOWED

So, no ... America is a sitting duck.

well then lets be very clear, you're for christian sharia

you don't believe in secular liberal democracy whatsoever

I am for the culling of Muslim culture.

We need a cap

you might as well call to be a theocracy

Now, if you consider me as more theocratic then who cares . Islam doesn't belong in the UK. It's about to get booted out.

The powers and control is about to be give back to the UK. They will stamp it out.

you want a religion, a stringent ideology of moral arbitration and dogma, to rule you

how are you any different from a muslim

All the Muslim looking people in Parliament, is just a charade ... These people have already swore an oath to the CHURCH OF ENGLAND.

So, I want rid of these Islamic pricks.

I think I made my intentions clear. And I wouldn't need to use force either. I would do it through voting. No different to what they are doing.

It means people can distinguish between it and it means people get to choose.

translate all of what you just said into arabic and there's no functional difference between you and an Imam

I want the church of England in control to prevent them from getting in.

You're an unabashed theocrat

Full stop.

England has a religion. And it's Anglican.

Simple as that.

England can have a religion, that's not in dispute

They have their own countries and so they need to go back to the..

Them.

said religion, nor any other, has any business being the state

That's the segregation part and I am for it . I want the church of England to be able to teach children in schools again because it was peaceful. I want all the rest of them who do not comply, to leave.

Simple as that. It's going to happen as well.

Then I really must wonder why you spoke so ill of Thatcher earlier

I sound like my mother, and she made sense. All that history and all that culture. Dissolved over stupid people.

you can have history and culture without becoming christian saudi arabia

This conversation is going to be over in 5 minutes. Because extremism comes from both sides . I realise that at the moment , Islam produces more Islamic extremists per capita.

And the far right is always in countries without a huge religious tie in politics. It makes people feel uneasy. For example , New Zealand, who need to have their own indegenious culture taught not the church of England or such the likes .... They need their own historical culture taught in schools. I think that would balance it out and make it fairer for them.

Places like Australia also have started to produce, a cult of far right ambitious gun twoting wannabes. Australia has no indegenious religious power or identity in politics. It has no religion in control.

If one takes over , then extremism will prevail.

The religion helps with people's identification. It helps with their culture and history.

What a phenomenal red herring! Yes, having a government that doesn't appease extremists tends to agitate said extremeists. the answer isn't to just hand them the fucking reigns of power from the start

So, fuck Islam it serves no place and doesn't belong in those countries either.

you have seriously lost the fucking plot, m8