otherwise not having an answer doesn't solve the problem

strawman

I never said there is no answer

> that is not how you address the issue
this implies there is a way to address the issue
so you must have an idea if you mentioned that

I just did

are you dense?

```[1:18 PM] Coolitic: that's how human interaction works buddy
[1:18 PM] Coolitic: and there is no singular, hard-and-fast answer to that```

no, that's an empty answer without any value

*for people who are socially retarded

this is just normal, human interaction

you are trying to analyze the situation as some sort of robot

looking for single, hard-and-fast answers

sorry kiddo, the avg human is more intelligent than that

I didn't ask for a single solution, I asked for a possible solution

you don't seem to understand what solving a problem means

olive branches

there is no single solution for this

empathy, combined with strict signaling of lines not to be crossed

so one side doesn't accept them and continue

they can devolve and destroy themselves then

which they do

problem solved

but before they will destroy themselves (which is kind of inevitable) they have an enemy they need to destroy

and, with the solutions I proposed

their enemy must simply be resilient by not falling prey to their tactics

and then they destroy themselves after enough time regardless

Remember, patience is a virtue

Also, if you give them reason to go after you more rabidly, by, say, adopting their horrible tactics

you'll just prolong the time it takes for them to destroy themselves

this essentially means it is a siege is need to just stay behind the walls and hope enemy starve out and walls are strong enough to hold them off

with walls that you can actively repair

walls that can actively expand forward

slowly but steadily

Posting this here, I think it would be better if the debate didn't continue on <#633967610706526210>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNr3yhjQPI8

cringe

Wasn't this pretty much what started the "they are normalizing pedophilia" screeching on the right... or lets accept it, in every side of politics?

idk

(It's a re-up, I don't remember which year the original was posted on TedX.)

There have been worse, and weirder "normalizing" speeches and articles, though.

remember, all you need to do is abide by these rules: