Message from @whiic
Discord ID: 642534435568353281
> The only thing worse than Donald Trump are his supporters.
- Matt "The Dissident Right is not Conservative" Walsh
These people kill me.
Anything to give themselves the idea that they are guilty of some crime, and so finding penitence to those alleged crimes makes themselves feel better. I'd dare say those ardent pro-climate-change advocates have some sort of perpetrator-complex.
Doc tackles something related to incels: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKHoeOxr3D0
I'm watching it **now** so I don't even know yet if it's tackling incel or anti-incel side.
Ok, apparently tackling anti-incels, i.e the popular side, supported by MSM.
> Hypothesis: women evolved higher conscientiousness because they mainly work in support role, lower complexity jobs where this trait is comparatively more useful. Meritocracy thus results in women continuing to work in such jobs.
Hmmm... that Randomercam video turned out to be anti-Sargon video, framed through a more radical anti-incel video.
He references Sargon's video giving advice to how incels could get laid, which wasn't totally the typical "take a shower, you loser, no-one wants to date you, because you are a loser" but it was still unhelpful to practically any incel... it just wasn't insulting.
And the irony of Sargon telling Emma Watson how she should live her life, and how she should breed, how breeding is the only meaning to existence and how she should stop being an incel.
Well I agree with Sargon with Emma Watson though I understand that he wasn’t all that helpful to incels with his advice
Well, why was he helpful toward Watson who is also an incel?
Because the topic is **consistency**.
I didn’t say helpful, I was saying he was good to tell her to not completely reject relationships and not settling down
Also that she should have kids and should settle down
Why should she, if she doesn't want them?
Why should people who don't want to be parents, become parents against their will?
Anything actually sensible?
Well she stated that she did in fact want them in the article, just that she blamed it on society and not her motherly instincts. But even so we need humans to continue civilization, so we should counter signal people not marrying
Not a government enforced law or anything
Remember that shit Jordan Peterson got in for saying “enforced monogamy”?
But he meant socially that we should tell people to have kids
...even when they don't want to.
Yes society should promote people to have kids
What other action should people be encouraged to do against their will?
And isn't it a problem for children to be raised by unloving parents?
I think if people absolutely DO NOT want kids they won’t have them
So I don’t think it will be a big issue
The option is still there
Plus with broken families in general there needs to be a safety net for kids
Another action? Conscription
Oh but this time by law
Why?
Yeah if your nation is at war you need to be working or fighting
Why should male obligation be by law but female obligation by social pressure that can be rejected?
Ok so there is multiple reasons for this, a good reason is that it would actually stop a lot of wars. Because every time we invaded the Middle East people would lose their shit eventually
Or maybe "Draft Our Daughters" is Ok.