come one Ford i can tell you have better insults than that

how, don't give him thomas sowell, you need basic economics before you can read <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

Link war! Explain your points. Dont go making each other read essays

The ideas I have are explained by this other guy!

Round 2

FIGHT!

---->>>>

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/400789193732784128/646473713876729887/EJlAEyZVAAEhAio.png

Black redneck and white liberals. Cracker culture (prevelent in the south) is a better explination for black cultural failure (as gang culture more closely associates with cracker culture than northern black culture)
Blacks in the north were more similar to their norther white counterparts and had a culture similar to the norther whites.
Blacks in the south had a culture more similar to the whites in the south and they were more prone to fights, lewd behaviour and 'honour' culture.
Blacks in the south (after emaciation) fled north and became the gang culture in the northern cities where integration was already highly successful.
Sowell goes through and shows that blacks can be successful if they are given the right school environment rather than have excuses made for them. Furthermore demonstrates that the welfare state (in vision of the anointed) had adverse affect on black families leading to more fatherlessness.

if there was some foreign source of new cracker/redneck types, i.e., poor uneducated whites with increased rates of crime and violence, would it make sense to allow them to immigrate to the US?

scotland highlands...

thats where the origins of cracker culture come from

i'm thinking more like russians

Incorrect. Northern Blacks had a selection filter whereby most of them were descendants of Free Slaves

>Sowell goes through and shows that blacks can be successful if they are given the right school environment rather than have excuses made for them.

Twin studies disagree

which twin studies?

vodka infused toothless slavniggers squatting in ex-soviet tenements

IQ gaps persist even after controlling for environmental factors

I find it fascinating that if you drop a sample of 100 random people into an environment, they will form seperate groups based more on values, and then form subgroups by phenotype.

<:smugon:512048583806025739> you act like a bunch of white niggers

Fords getting woke on the iq question, yes there is a genetic component to iq but iq is a scale

furthermore iq is a useful tool but is not 1 to 1 success nor wisdom

And?

asians are, on average smarter than whites therefore exterminate the whites?

IQ is the best predictor of success and has a racial component of around 80%

LMFAO

You exposed yourself with the classic strawman which isn't even used by the left anymore

Who said about exterminating races?

@D3bug_logic you waste your time

well you are pointing out blacks have less iq then whites on average so what thats meaning less statement

>Sowell goes through and shows that blacks can be successful if they are given the right school environment rather than have excuses made for them.
I was responding to this

You cannot eliminate genetics through environment

lol thats your response

so because they might not be as successful they wont be successful...

This is what gives rise to the far left environmental determinism of "white privilege"

He did not seem to advocate exterminating any races so am lost

It is also interesting that communities of people will almost always form small outgroups that I like to call "The Niggers". For example the "skeets" in my local area would probably equate to similar behaviour to groups otherwise referred to "niggers".

Hence, my theory that the word "nigger" is no longer just confined to worthless black folk. It is also applicable to worthless people of any race.