Message from @Lucienne d'Anwyl
Discord ID: 647504802204352545
They changed the law? I thought they were enforcing already existing law?
@Hommedaction That's a fine one, but we need to list of probabilities, perhaps on a randomized and rotational list.
That can’t last forever
Gab survived
The law is an existing law
it can if the DNS companies act like YT
No king rules forever, my genderfluid child
Also there is always TOR
and they probably will
if they start really cracking down on us, can always go to TOR
tor doesn't work for servers
They are enforcing he law against people's taking information from people under 13
TOR is...... Not the alternative I would like.
They're not cracking down on anything other than the companies data mining
problem with TOR is the same as with Bittorrent
Well it does. There are just some issues with hidden services being easy to DDOS
I'd rather go back to usenet
the server/seed files need to be in a place you can find them
Can't wait to send memes through smoke signals
they can target hosts
YouTubers are just more or less victims of accidentally violating the law because YouTube is run by data stwalers
*Jews
sorry what
sperged
if the server holding the Bitchute nodes are targeted, there won't be enough nodes to run the network
<:sarGOY:462286263622303754>
Bitchuts would only get targeted if they mine data
Does bitchuts mine data?
If not then it isn't a problem
that isn't how the COPPA law works
COPPA makes it illegal to log ANY cookies from kids under 13
Yea with a DDOS you’re right however... hidden services are vulnerable to a DDOS because they don’t use a usual captcha because it can de-anonymize users
Uh huh
So no targeted ads no problem
as SOON as a server is started, you know damn well kiddies will browse there
and the FTC will use that to shut them down
On tor they can’t tell who is accessing bitchute
🎷 🐛
I mean, we all saw this coming ya?
alot of these services REQUIRE cookies or otherwise only the internet savvy wizzards will visit
worse to come