it does have that ability

and i tend to use synonuyms to keep subtle difference seperate via convention

internally, i 'see' a slightly different concept despite the standard definition not having the resolution to differentiate

the whole synonyms things is bs

not one of them is interchangeable and that says something about their meaning 😛

not if used to increase the gain while staying within the confines of the standard definition

well, yeah. in that manner

they are kind of bs; they introduce ambiguity

then again, you need a degree of ambiguity to maintain flexibility

without flexibility, two people can't communicate

the concepts in your head aren't exactly like those in my head, despite using the same label

synonyms allow both parties to have representation

the whole 'people' and 'communicating' isnt too much on my mind but i do see the point

well, if 'truth' is the common component of everyone's subjective observations

the more observations you can integrate into the same context, the more closely you can approximate that truth

but still i wouldnt say it's necessarily ambiguous but perhaps it's my autism 😛

i mean i get ambiguity in speech is extremely common

but it's not the words it's the users 😛

this is also true

i think of words as having multiple variables

it saddens me that the left has ruined things in regards to being able to negotiate vocabulary

in their semantic 'field'

yes

yup

that's the worst actually their language rape lol orwell was conservative with his predictions

one thing that matters is if both people understand each other; that they use a standard external vocabulary is secondary and should never impede the exchange of ideas

^^^^^^^^^ pedo

Yes

lol

I need to time it so the image loads right as someone posts something

Biggot Brian

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Big-Brain-big-Mac

Yes

Big BRAIN

bigoof