Message from @Wayward Lone
Discord ID: 642711855072280586
like by sheer cosmic fucking happenstance we're wrong and the meme is really innappropriate
I mean, I'd have a laugh
Epstein was verified scum, laughing at his death is always ok. But also, laughing at anyone's death is ok, it's one of humanities most effective coping mechanism
Have a laugh, move on
Yow.
Jebus... This thing is imploding on Democrats faster then I believe it would.
Oof. I smell a wrongful termination lawsuit in ABC's future.
If you want to troll the Biden campaign, text “ok boomer” to 30330. Vermin loves you!
Done.
Fun part about red pills is there are two waking states.
There's 'woke' and then there's 'awake'.
Why is this kind of thing increasing in America?
He's done <:poggers:583775485620781087>
Vindman's bombshell was such a dud it was dismissed back in October. It just shows how weak impeachment still is at the moment~ Today I seen articles using Vindman's opinion attacking John Solomon's journalism! Hahaha... Sorry soldier. I will take court documents, DOJ emails, and documented evidence over your opinion.
Shame we have evidence of the White House modifying evidence <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Vindman said “he would have edited the transcript to specifically show that Zelensky mentioned Burisma — the company that hired Hunter Biden — rather than just ‘the company,’ according to sources.”
Oh noo! This is the smoking gun? 'I would... I would have been more specific on what the company is!
> Mr. Trump has repeatedly insisted that the memorandum was a “word for word” transcript. We now know that to be a lie.
> In Lt. Col. Vindman’s deposition, he told Congress that he had taken notes of the conversation between the two Presidents in July. Vindman explains that the White House edited the memorandum to remove specific mentions of Burisma.
:gasp:
Also, sorry bud. Breitbart is biased, can't use that.
But James... You now support that narrative the FISA court was abused to attack Trump.
They didn't specifically name Hillary Clinton ^_-
Fisa court is used against foreign assets in the USA. Trump is one. Perfectly acceptable use, indeed it is the intended use.
As per the Mueller Report: The president and his campaign did not collude with Russia. Legally, he is in the clear.
> The president and his campaign did not collude with Russia
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Aww... Not even going to give Mueller some credit?
Poor guy didn't even know what Fusion GPS was. So I guess I cannot blame you.
You'll actually find the wording to be along these lines: "but concluded that there was insufficient evidence to bring any conspiracy or coordination charges against Trump or his associates."
Funny that they say that when some of Trumps associates have already been charged...
If we were to use your own source:
Charged with what? Point to one that was charged in conspiring with the Russians.
"conspiracy", "lying to the FBI", "Money laundering"