Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 643470917233672193
Meaning, less tax income
at worst... the gov nationalises it for even cheaper than it is now 😛
Meaning, less products being produced
Meaning, they have leverage over us
How are you a fucking Chinese shill?
zero leverage
You're brain-dead
Im pro UK having leverage over china
Yet you're pro-Brexit, which will mean more Chinese investment in the UK...
And you're pro-Chinese investment in the UK <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Giving them more control over us
LMAO
and Ive just explained why we have leverage over them.. and they have zero leverage over us 😛
Your words and actions contradict eachother
And I've explained how your reasoning is flawed.
cos they cant "pull investment"
they can only "sell" ..
We've just explained how they can <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
I think there's leverage on both sides
if they "sell" then they need a "buyer"
which is why they have no leverage
So they sell it for pennies, but still cause more damage to the UK economy...
But they do <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
how?
Becuase the loss of those jobs, assets and industry is more damaging to us, than to them
so the gov can buy it today for 70m ...
lets say china tries something... so the gov says, nah just go ahead and pull investment... gov buys it 10m
So we nationalise it <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
how does china win there?
So you're pro-nationalisation? <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
if its pennies on the pound... sure
although Im sure for that cheap china should be able to find a buyer
So, why give them that possible influence in the first place?
In a critical industry like that:?
what influence?
You're just arguing in bad faith now
Bye
you still havent explained what influence they have 😛
at worst you said they could pull investment... I just explained why thats not an issue
hmm Iran just found a massive new oil field... second largest in the country