But social libertarians exist

That's 3

No

Yes

Public nudity and children fall into one thing

No

These are 3 areas

The only reason public nudity should be illegal is because of children

That’s the only reason I could think of anyway

And children get no rights

So 3

No

They get protected

That’s not ant libertarian to protect children

Like their should be laws like you have to be 18 to drink drive have sex etc, like we have already

Libertarianism isn’t anarchy

Right

Those are all restrictions on liberty..

Ok?

Ok

I’m perfectly fine with that

If it makes me a hypocrite I’m fine

Glad we know ur ok with it bby xxx

I just don’t want 5 year olds to get raped

Good meme

Then stop being a lolbertarian

No

Libertarianism doesn’t argue for the right of children’s to have sex

_Accepts framing_

Some do but they don’t get socially accwpted

>I don't want children to be raped
>Okay, then don't do this
>No

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

Libertarianism doesn’t agree with child rape

Do you understand that?

There should still be a state and police

Imagine thinking not letting kids get raped is a revolutionary idea

One of the roles of the state should be to protect the vulnerable, etc children

I don’t think it is

It should protect you

From your ideas

I’m under 18