The alt hyp will disagree

Because if AR named the trait (like IQ) they would have to admit high IQ niggers, and purge the white rednecks.

>AR can name the Jew, but they cannot name the trait.
That's literally incorrect

They don't like to name preferential traits humans should have, they don't like to name virtues to be promoted. It's your race, your culture, by definition, nothing to improve.

@Monstrous Moonshine So high IQ nigger is better than low IQ white? And you are in favor of East Asian immigration to raise IQ?

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40806-017-0115-7

How is that an ethnostate?

See this for which traits are responsible for typical 'Jewish' behavior

>So high IQ nigger is better than low IQ white? And you are in favor of East Asian immigration to raise IQ?
No

But if some white individual has those "Jewy" traits (and many do) should they be treated like Jews despite being whites?

This is why IQ is a junction, not the end argument

No, because you aren't interested in the trait in whites.

We are interested in many more things than *just* the traits

We see homogeneous societies as an extension of the family unit and hence see it as a moral obligation to the extended kin

Should whites with "Jewy" traits be deported to Israel?

From which stems the concept of nationalism

Should wiggers be deported "back" to Africa?

Arguing racial differences in IQ and IQ nationalism would result in mass importing gooks and pajeets

Jews do cluster with southern Italians so I would say Ashkenazis are racially white, my issue with them is they have split loyalties. Or at least that’s the stereotype

And thus it is clearly only a temporary junction

It is more than a material argument, the traditionalist perspective is spiritual

@Monstrous Moonshine And what's the problem with importation of gooks and pajeets?

Social cohesion

Robert Putnams study

They can create their own country and live there

Racial diversity fucks up community unity

If you valued **traits** over nihilism, you would prefer gooks over meth-addicted West Virginians.

I already answered this

We see it as a moral obligation to uplift the meth-addicted West Virginians

This is why I say AR cannot name a trait. They only name the Jew, Gook and Pajeet.

Instead of abandoning them for an alien gook

Plus whites cluster with each other genetically and Asians don’t, a book called “on genetic interests” explains this idea that whites are more related than Asians. So it’s in the interests of whites to wall off a border

Again, you don't discriminate against Gook for any **trait** they hold. You discriminate them only on their label: "Gook".

Because whites are more related, they are more like a family

Because they are genetically dissimilar yeah

Because that label is more than just the direct sum of his material traits

Because the effect of having gook sub communities yeah

There is consequences and traits, gooks naturally will want different things than whites

And those preferences and biological learnings pop up

Even if it’s at adds with others

Hispanics in California will vote in socialism for example