It all happens over time

The eternal vigilance is anathema to tolerance given this context.

Vigilance requires rebuke to actually mean anything.

Overdose, no roles, free for all..

A guard atop a city wall must repel or otherwise correct the behavior of trespassers, no?

That always leads to the same

A guard who waves anyone into the city is surely not good at their job.

The tolerant guard will open the gates to any threat on an suicidally altruistic grounds.

What is a guard that does not guard?

^

A greeter at your local Walmart, really

kek

Why would especially the guard be ignorant? @spooky ducc

"A guard who waves anyone into the city is surely not good at their job."

sorry what

I'm having trouble with this one I don't think the sentence flows right

I'm not sure what's being asked of me here

Maybe 'just anyone' or 'everyone' would be better at expressing what you meant

I quoted you correctly, didn't I? @spooky ducc

Are you arguing intent?

Earlier above I quoted a phrase which conclusion I couldn't follow

"Why would especially the guard be ignorant?"

that's where I'm having issues

what is this sentence asking me

I think it's the placement of "especially"

especially should be specifically

"Why specifically should the guard be ignorant"

Is that what you meant?

It was a question of something you wrote, which made me question if you had understood what I meant under "Eternal vigilance"

If so, the answer is "false question," I never implied the guard *should* be ignorant. That's the point.

You've lost the plot.

We'll all be turning into Jordan Peterson at the end of this, if we're all being this careful with our words

Let's run this back.

Yes, thnks

"A guard who waves anyone into the city is surely not good at their job.
The tolerant guard will open the gates to any threat on an suicidally altruistic grounds."

This is plainly evident.

Tolerance holds open ports of entry to threatening individuals and ideas.

While social vigilance restricts this movement.

Only if you have tolerance mixed with acceptance as same virtues

No

Again, I stress we then define tolerance as hypertolerance in this regard.

You've hit the disconnect again