You implied it by the question.
It's just the common misconception, I guess
It is given in return for contrition. Yess
So then it is not hypertolerance.
?
If you want an example of hypertolerance, look at, say
The furry community
They're known for being especially raunchy and depraved because they both tolerate and accept the fucked behavior of anybody who claims their mantle.
Instead of enforcing standards and rebuking the fucked.
Ignorance does not mix well with respect or tolerance.
Leave tolerance from the equation in that case.
Furries are not moral
Tolerance is a moral trojan horse
Which is Aristotle's point.
Or rather what we've acquiesced to define as hyper* tolerance
Tolerance corrodes morality until morality no longer exists
"Tolerance is a moral trojan horse" It can be, I can and will unequivocally grant you that @spooky ducc
Doesn't have to
The eternal vigilance
Prolonged toleration can lead to normalization of amorality
Yes, sure.
Toleration creates apathy
It can.
It all happens over time
The eternal vigilance is anathema to tolerance given this context.
Vigilance requires rebuke to actually mean anything.
Overdose, no roles, free for all..
A guard atop a city wall must repel or otherwise correct the behavior of trespassers, no?
That always leads to the same
A guard who waves anyone into the city is surely not good at their job.
The tolerant guard will open the gates to any threat on an suicidally altruistic grounds.
What is a guard that does not guard?
^
A greeter at your local Walmart, really
kek
Why would especially the guard be ignorant? @spooky ducc "A guard who waves anyone into the city is surely not good at their job."
sorry what
I'm having trouble with this one I don't think the sentence flows right
I'm not sure what's being asked of me here
Maybe 'just anyone' or 'everyone' would be better at expressing what you meant
