Yes

Idk

Don’t give a shit about the Holocaust

How is it "Yes" and "Idk" at the same time?

Shit was like 80 years ago

And unrelated to America

Different opinions @whiic

Duh

But one objective reality, dude.

De de dur dur, my opinions matter

Probably trust ford on that then

Cuz I didn’t read into it

Just laughed

We know a lot from 2000 years ago, and we suddenly pretend we cannot know what happened a couple of decades ago.

Why does the lesson have to be learnt from the Holocaust and not the holomodor ?

Or other genocides

Errr... I never said that.

I think we should learn from Holocaust **AND** Holodomor.

Genocide bad

Ok I know

And I do agree Holocaust is over-emphasized. The solution is not denial. It's pointing out that USSR was even worse than nazis.

And I agree USSR was worse.

I'm Finnish for fucks sake.

I don’t deny the Holocaust

Of course I agree.

@snake Tell it to Fuentes.

He doesn't either, it was in response to a superchat

It's the hole you decided to lay in.

@Monstrous Moonshine Not really a defense. If an SJW gave 2 dollars to Sargon, would Sargon agree with the SJW just because of the donation?

And if he did, would that be a good defense on his moral character, selling his beliefs for 2 bucks?

He made an edgy joke in response to a superchat

Big deal

Joke? Someone said "Idk", i.e didn't even know if it was a joke.

I think it was a joke

And someone who is an *actual self-identified white nationalist* didn't know if it was or not. Doesn't that concern you when **political commentators** make statements what sound ridiculous but don't carry any signifiers of being a joke?

Like: Green New Deal

Well, those included not just commentators but a few elected congress people.

So it was even worse.

Maybe he shouldn’t have said that but it sounded like a joke

I still don't like shielding behind "it's a joke" if it shows no sign of being a joke, and if was a joke, would benefit your opposiotion. Why should I **ASSUME** it was a joke in those conditions?