I fathom the possibility all the time, but that's different from whether I am or not

yet the result APPEARS dishonest

perhaps your result is no different DESPITE your intention

you nor i are in a position to make such an objective evaluation

Fact check: I never said Anita wasn't dishonest. I can't possibly know that. I've always said that it's my opinion she's not and I've seen no conclusive evidence that she is. So ... innocent until proven guilty.

one set of observations does not an objective evaluation make

would still smash ngl

ich auch

smash

Marushia, that is splitting hairs and quite irrelevant in the context of my statement

you acknowledge the possibility

There's plenty of evidence she's dishonest. The best example I could think of is the Hitman Absolution take

there is plenty of evidence to SUGGEST she is dishonest

If you read my article, you'll note the myriad times I've acknowledged the possibility she could be, just that it has never been proven to my personal satisfaction

Dodge. Pretentious Dodge

link the article?

soz been outside

"Read principica mathmatica and THEN you'll understand my math is correct"

ELSE:WHERE

Guys

How would someone prove it beyond a reasonable doubt if blatant misrepresentation and lies aren't enough

I NEED HELP

@Marushia Dark Anita sarkeesian? she's dishonest

MA, is that the kind of world you wanna live in? Cuz if so, then you have to treat all the anti-Trumpers' assertions as credible.

dishonesty is a conscious choice

it's conscious

Talk to your doctor

i would think it a reasonable assumption that in chat, when you make an argument you are bound by the Rules of Evidence

"Look at all this smoke! There MUST be fire."

you cannot submit evidence DURING your argument

you must submit the evidence prior and get the other side a chance to digest it

"prove your argument is true before you even argue it" -_-

i dont know whether or not dat shit's on fire but man am i going to douse it just in case

dude freakin deja vue

I had this chat before

More like "provide evidence for your argument before you say it's true"

otherwise, it's just a dodge, claiming you have 'forbidden knowledge' i lack; while true, so do i

so does everyone

hehe ralin all chats had been had

it's not an argument

its fine