Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 644318014279516174
only the refusal to ACCEPT the single common reality
you confuse 'reality' with 'facts'
silly nazis didnt exist back then
facts != truths
they're only here since 2016 dontchukno
Employers favor men not because they are prejudiced against women, but because they have the perception that men perform better on average at certain tasks. https://t.co/RRcBSRCQfA
>perception
facts are a consesus of what we THINK happend
not nessecarily what ACTUALLY happend
>perception
😄
Oh ... MA with this postmodernist bullshit again
What we think beyond a reasonable doubt happened
daily reminder about the australian gender bias study that got cancelled as soon as it became evident women are favoured
you are the postmodernist, mar
not myself
no u
you substutute your perception for reality
i am a post-postmodernist as per ian cohen, jack stewart
@ManAnimal false realities are lies but the people still believe the reality is real
no one has a monopoly on truth
is that focault
the past 100 years, we've all lived in a false reality, anyone saying so is drowned out by the people believing the false reality
im shite with faces somebody help
@svarozhyc That looks like the dude from The Weather Channel
i find it odd, Mar that while you can admit the possibilit that someone like Sarkeesian might be acting out of something else other than intentional dishonesty, yet you cannot fathom the possibility that YOU might be doing the same thing
In what way am I being dishonest?
pot, are you a kettle?
we've had 1 lie after the other that require the previous lie in order to maintain
not what i implied by that statement
you assert Anita is NOT being dishonest
I fathom the possibility all the time, but that's different from whether I am or not
yet the result APPEARS dishonest
perhaps your result is no different DESPITE your intention
you nor i are in a position to make such an objective evaluation
Fact check: I never said Anita wasn't dishonest. I can't possibly know that. I've always said that it's my opinion she's not and I've seen no conclusive evidence that she is. So ... innocent until proven guilty.
one set of observations does not an objective evaluation make
would still smash ngl
ich auch