No it doesn't it's called tactics.
As it has..
No, that's called strategy
A proven strategy which has worked
You just send in rifle men and wipe them out in small engagements.
So we have covered how we dont gain anything by helping them
No? @UnScottable
You've not said anything?>
As they have no nation.. nor are they in any of our alliances
Other than 'Israel bad'
"Another ally in the region. Denying the Syrians land and power / influence. Weakening the Turks."
Have the US there in a military form is a bs way to say we should be meat shields for goat fuckers.
Are you unable to read? @UnScottable
The Kurdish people do not have a country
k
You'd have us fight syria to defend these people who are disgusting. The fact that youd let american lives die for theirs... disgusting as well
Should the US intervene to protect the Rohiga?
If you care about foreign influence around the world, then yes
LOL
Like I said. Go join the kurds
if you care so much
There's no strategy in positioning troops to defend people without taking action to defeat the threat against them.
^
Are you people all just isolationists?
Nathan would have us fight endless wars
as we have been for decades.
Lmao, what wrong with wanting to be an Isolationist?
:brainlet:
No we aren't going to support an action that has no longer term strategy than "Mah Feels"
I thought the whole world hated us for that. Now we stop and they hate us again. WHICH IS IT?
I've not said "mah feels"
But you are
Why are you Yanks unable to read?
You are
How is that feelings?
as the benefits of helping them do not justify the cost
This is literally why America is a joke
I love it
Turkey has our nukes. Lets just piss them off so they decide to sell them on the black market.
>America, Get out of the Middle East, we don't want you here >K *Leaves* >Wait, don't go, we need protection against Turkey
