Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 631975555679649793


2019-10-10 22:00:14 UTC  

The soviets were expansionist

2019-10-10 22:00:18 UTC  

Yep

2019-10-10 22:00:20 UTC  

china is arguably expansionist

2019-10-10 22:00:23 UTC  

Yep

2019-10-10 22:01:10 UTC  

Syria wanting a chunk of land that honestly its up in the air whether or not Israel did or didn't just offer to give back, isn't a fucking "expansion"

2019-10-10 22:01:20 UTC  

By our definition it is.

2019-10-10 22:01:58 UTC  

Anyway, conflict between Syria and Israel isn't something we want

2019-10-10 22:02:06 UTC  

The Jews will come crawling for aid

2019-10-10 22:02:11 UTC  

Not something we want to be forced to give them.

2019-10-10 22:02:12 UTC  

by "your" definition no country on this planet can exist in a state that isn't staunch ally or hated adversary, fuck "your" definitions

2019-10-10 22:02:28 UTC  

"my" definition being 'dictionary.com'

2019-10-10 22:02:40 UTC  

And you, not having a definition.

2019-10-10 22:03:26 UTC  

"a website said a policy of expanding is expansionist"
that's great. retaking something you had but lost still isn't an expansion

2019-10-10 22:04:06 UTC  

An internationally accepted definition? Yes. <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-10-10 22:04:37 UTC  

"a policy or practice of expansion and especially of territorial expansion by a nation"

2019-10-10 22:04:39 UTC  

There's another one.

2019-10-10 22:04:46 UTC  

"A nation's practice or policy of territorial or economic expansion"

2019-10-10 22:04:48 UTC  

And another one.

2019-10-10 22:05:18 UTC  

and still nothing about whether said territory is in fact being claimed after first having been lost

2019-10-10 22:05:18 UTC  

"related to increasing the amount of land ruled by a country"

2019-10-10 22:05:19 UTC  

And another one.

2019-10-10 22:05:24 UTC  

fascinating

2019-10-10 22:05:32 UTC  

you're really pretending that clause doesn't matter

2019-10-10 22:05:36 UTC  

The previous state does not matter <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-10-10 22:05:48 UTC  

yes, it really does

2019-10-10 22:05:52 UTC  

Expansionism is an act <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-10-10 22:05:57 UTC  

An act of increasing the nations land

2019-10-10 22:05:58 UTC  

LOL

2019-10-10 22:06:36 UTC  

Ones generally that have been agreed upon internationally

2019-10-10 22:06:44 UTC  

As shown through those definitions.

2019-10-10 22:08:06 UTC  

you keep saying that as if the definitions take the context into account

2019-10-10 22:08:13 UTC  

is english your first language?

2019-10-10 22:08:20 UTC  

They don't need to take the context into account

2019-10-10 22:08:37 UTC  

No, Norwegen

2019-10-10 22:08:54 UTC  

>definition don't need to take definitions into account
A, yes, they kinda do,
B, if they don't what the fuck's the point of saying "they all say the same thing"

2019-10-10 22:09:20 UTC  

"Expansionism" is an act. An act of expanding the land of a country.

2019-10-10 22:09:40 UTC  

If you practice expansionism, then you're an expansionist.

2019-10-10 22:09:48 UTC  

if that country already had that land and lost it, taking it back isn't a fucking expansion, jesus christ