you haven't shown jack shit, you've literally avoided directly addressing my argument, and shown sources that explicity avoid the basis of my argument. How the fuck do you expect to disprove what you actively avoid addressing?
"Again. Expansionism is an act, the act of expanding ones controlled land. Retaking lost land, is expanding your controlled land. Thus is expansionist"
>I've asserted and repeated my own claim, therefore I've shown yours to be false
oh by all means, continue citing definitions that explicitly don't address my argument
good god no wonder you have no idea how foreign relations work. this kind of logic would cause even more fucking wars and conflicts than there already are
