Message from @Death in June
Discord ID: 631719142835093524
Wrong
no it's not wrong
It is, though
because africans are far more prone to criminal activity and tend to be poorer by virtue of their low intelligence
you can't meaningfully separate these variables from race
You only think that because your head is permanently wedged inside your own asshole
epic
so you dispute the fact that black people are far more prone to criminal activity and that they are far less intelligent than white people?
People in lower income levels are more prone to criminal activity
the amount of black people present in an area is a better predictor of violent crime than poverty
Show me the study
You can simply compare the crime rates of a poor white community and a poor black community
No, you can't. You also have to match the other criteria - age range, level of urban development, industry, level of social cohesion, area of the country, etc.
Same with the united kingdom, compare the crime rate in low income arab communities with the crime rate of low income english communities
Wonder what you'll find 🤔
Once again, culture is only loosely tethered to race. There are Muslims of all different races, but their culture is similar
black people will naturally tend toward having lower incomes because they are far less intelligent on average
@Death in June This chart doesn't show any of the threat coefficients - the rankings could be almost equal in weight or they could be vastly different - it doesn't tell you
Oh wait, never mind
This chart deliberately muddies the waters for your arguments - there are a significant number of positive and negative indicators on this chart that individually outweigh racial factors
And, taken as a whole, they VASTLY outweigh any sort of solely race-based coefficients
Thanks for proving my point for me, though
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
what point does that prove
this seems to show that black people are in fact more prone to criminal activity
even when controlling for other variables
variables that are partially the result of people's race anyhow
You don't have controlled variables here
like poverty
The coefficient for poverty is almost just as high as the one for "percent black"
and
that doesn't go against the original point
and of course again
being black leads to poverty
But that doesn't really tell the whole story - because there's not a universal definition for poverty
so by separating the variables in this manner we're understating the impact blackness has