I posted the article with sources

Post the sources

There were none highlighted.

Show them.

shit look at google there are tons of others but I dont want to spam

Not the article.

If you're not going to read the article why would I post sources?

Because it isn't easy to find on the article

I dont' see them

repost

I posted it for you

No

You posted the site

It's all in hyperlinks

You are being lazy.

Copy the hyperlinks

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/18/what-the-experts-really-think-about-race-realism-and-white-nationalism-or-at-least-ideas-pertaining-to-it/

Show your .edus

This is an article

Yes

Now show the sources

Read it yourself

We don't want a fiction piece

Give the actual proof.

Why tell us to research your own claims?

I'm not

Burden of proof lies on you.

I posted the research

No

That's an article

You just have to read it

If we post huffingtonpost

it's not research

If it has research linked into it I'd read it

Then show the researched linked into it

We don't know if you read it or not.

I've watchted the video on the article

You watched a video on it?

I am reading it and there is not much science nor anything useful just bullshit dialogue of history sayign this and that the typical fascist bs like omg but da left ww2 anti racism but no it muh fweedom asian used to be dum dum but now dei smart so not explainuble

A second hand source on a second source?

The video is based on the article