That wasn't what you said

Name a single major far left social media account that got banned that wasn't doing something illegal

it's rehashed conservatism.. it's the sort of "blood and soil" and "nativist" nonsense that characterized conservative movements for the first half of the 20th century and most of the 19th century.

Hm

You're presenting both ideologies of being equally in violation of TOS

If that's what you by conservatism

on social media companies

conservatives are more likely to be racist

thus are more likely to get banned

There wont ever be equality with regards to this

You can be racist against whites

while "liberal" movements were focused on basically saying "you're all fucking plebs, you're all subordinate to capital"

>racist

ok

>hwytes

>words I dont like

ok

you probably consider benign things racist

>implying anyone is hwyte

RAciAl ReAliSt*

Thats totally what I said

like pointing out there are racial differences in IQ

I'm taking a guess

I think you're pretty low IQ to be frank

>muh skull callipers

Ok and?

seeing as you literally think me asserting conservatives are more likely to be racist

is the same as saying everyone is racist

no

that's not what I said

"you probably consider benign things racist"

I said you likely consider benign things racist because you're far left

that's generally true from what I've seen

Center left

OK clearly I didn't assert that being a literal thing

is racist

So please go be retarded somewhere else?

Hey tabbot

Like why do we just get the dumb right wingers

>reeeeee

depends what you mean by conservative to be quite honest; I certainly see most social conservatism as being particularly vulnerable to taking on racist or at least bigoted stances due to nationality or ethnicity, there might be some circumstances where race isn't involved, as a whole though that's not how I would describe most american or even european conservatives, given the reaction to catholic immigrants from central america.