That’s too broad

And unscientific

For you

That’s your opinion

But it’s not fact

That’s not an opinion

That’s scientific fact

Something being too broad and unscientific for you is a fact

??

It’s an opinion

I’m using scientific definitons

As am I

For explaining the plane of existence

No, you are not

Thoughts exist

That’s the end of it

They are simply electric waves

That cannot be translated to material value

You’re simply cells then?

Cells make part of a bigger structure

We’re simply matter???

Thoughts are just electric pulses

As again, misrepresentation

I’m not arguing its value

You’re derailing

I’m saying they exist

I am arguing how thoughts exist in the plane of reality

Answer simply

Do thoughts exist or not?

You are babbling psuedoscientifc definitions

It’s not pseudoscience

That question is too broad

Specify it

In YOUR opinion

You are using pseudoscientific definitons

Many other before you understood

My statement

Just because a thought exists doesn’t mean such exists on a material value

Let’s say I give you that

It still exist LOL

No, it doesn’t