Message from @redskegg
Discord ID: 328171749818761226
Tbqh that definition of real socialism would work if we had a society of even 100+ IQ people who all understood the benefits of contributing to a collective community, and then just got rid of the rest.
The issue is, "the rest" is currently at the very least 5 billion people.
Exactly Riefen. "Democratically control" is where it stops being viable. Democracy allows those who should have no say to have a voice.
IMO, those who have no say= low IQ
= minorities who think they are entitled
= LGBTQ, as they will have no kids therefore no legacy or offspring, so why do they get to make choices
And so on
Democracy is great in an oligarchy imo
I'd rather have a meritocracy
Only the very peak of the society should be voting if it's a democracy
Exactly.
How many uneducated fucking idiots blindly followed Hillary, or even trump for that matter just on the basis of the two party system.
Oh, absolutely would prefer a meritocracy, but I've always been taught/heard that oligarchy encompasses that
Kinda like fascism encompasses NatSoc and Falange
Meritocracy is a win.
I could be wrong on that oligarchy / meritocracy thing, if so then for sure let me know.
Yeah, the amount of people supporting any candidate this past election just because of reasons or feefees as opposed to logic is a perfect example of why the voting pool needs to shrink
The gene pool while we're at it tbh
I still don't know if the majority of fascists are capitalists.
I've seen the argument for capitalism and it seems very selfish for a non materialistic, non selfish political cause.
Small scale capitalism, in the sense of "Mr. Baker is a doctor but, since he was a child, has wanted to open a bookstore. He's been saving money, and when he retires, opens his own bookstore." - the free enterprise aspect is trad as it gets and very wholesome.
Large scale capitalism, "Schlomo informs Moshe that they are going to start selling water for $2 a gallon instead of 50 cents" is inherently evil.
Bingo. So there is an agreed middle ground, that's refreshing.
I like the idea of rationing necessities and money earned through your career can fund desires.
For example, public transportation being paid for by taxes but cars being a private investment.
These shitty cartoons always have me rolling lmao
Hey you guys were talking about free market economics
Oh?
I have a good copy pasta I made up about 3rd position economics
To my understanding, third positionism means that the market is free, however, if the business threatens the state, or harms the nation's citizens, by either outsourcing jobs, relocating, making deals with enemy nations, or hiring immigrants because they are cheaper, the state will take over the business, and run it the right way. Theres also protectionism in trade. There is a free market, until a business/corporation breaks one of the rules.
-Outsources jobs to third world countries
-outsources hq to save on taxes
-uses immigrants as sources of cheap labor
-sells out to other competing nations
If a rule is broken, the government will seize the company, control it until it is running functionally within the parameters set by the gov, then return the business to reappoint a CEO, or any other positions made vacant by wrong doers.
Welfare is only for veterans, the elderly, and the disabled. If you legitimately can not get a job, you will do government work, like road work, construction, renovation, etc, for a livable wage that will support you and your family.
It's basically free market for the Middle class because that's what works, and regulation for huge corporations and the like
Low taxes and regulations on middle and lower but higher taxes on corporations and super rich because they can afford it, protectionism to guard against malpractice ect
That sounds 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻
Free market middle class is outstanding.
Thank you
@Nathan TX Economic distribution follows the pareto principle. Any tax plan that violates this principle instead of working with it will corrupt the governing institutions.
What do you mean
There isn't much distribution going on
The problem with this 3rd position is that Mr X holds a position in government to decide if a company is violating the rules. He decides company ABC is and nationalized it, removing the owner from power and eventually handing it over to his politically connected friends.
The only way to avoid that is to make sure we 1. Have no kikes
2. Make the penalty for such a crime so severe that no one would dare.
I'm not entirely concrete on the removal and temporary absorption of company/position by govt